2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.08.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto tails and lognormal body of US cities size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rank-size distribution does not hold true for extremely small or extremely large sizes of settlement, which is in accordance with previous studies (Gabaix 1999b;Newman 2005). Although Eeckhout (2004) argues that the entire distribution of city sizes is lognormal, studies by authors that affirm that the distribution of city sizes have a Pareto tail and a lognormal body (Bee, Riccaboni & Schiavo 2011Clauset, Shalizi & Newman 2009;Ioannides and Skouras, 2013;Luckstead and Devadoss, 2017;Malavergne, Pisarenko & Sornette 2011) are consistent with our results. Our study follows the study of Fazio and Modica (2015), which examined alternative city size distributions depending on differing truncation points and proved the validity of Eeckhout's (2009) study, stating that the choice of Pareto or lognormal distribution depends on the truncation point, wherein the upper tail is longer than assumed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The rank-size distribution does not hold true for extremely small or extremely large sizes of settlement, which is in accordance with previous studies (Gabaix 1999b;Newman 2005). Although Eeckhout (2004) argues that the entire distribution of city sizes is lognormal, studies by authors that affirm that the distribution of city sizes have a Pareto tail and a lognormal body (Bee, Riccaboni & Schiavo 2011Clauset, Shalizi & Newman 2009;Ioannides and Skouras, 2013;Luckstead and Devadoss, 2017;Malavergne, Pisarenko & Sornette 2011) are consistent with our results. Our study follows the study of Fazio and Modica (2015), which examined alternative city size distributions depending on differing truncation points and proved the validity of Eeckhout's (2009) study, stating that the choice of Pareto or lognormal distribution depends on the truncation point, wherein the upper tail is longer than assumed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Looking for a good fitting of city size distribution in the lower and middle part of the size has been the object of a number of recent papers [21,34,53,54,55,65,66,67,79,80]. The conclusion that can be extracted from these accurate simulations based on real data of large countries (mostly India and Unites States) is that lognormal distribution and its variants provides an accurate description of the middle part (in agreement with the claim of Eechout [40]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Furthermore, the analysis of data in point 2 has connections with the contributions of Loannides, Overman (2003), Nitsch (2005), Newman (2005), Giesen et al (2010), Gómez-Déniz et al (2014), Gómez-Déniz, Calderín-Ojeda (2015), Shujuan (2016), Luckstead, Devadoss (2017), that tried to find the best distributions to fit better the frequency of cities by size. Actually, although deserving further attention in future works, point 2 shows that Pareto distributions seem to fit most countries of the sample, Log normal distributions are better for countries with remote and small cities and a combination of distributions are the outcome of situations when first cities empty second ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cordoba (2008) shows that the profile of the Zipf curve comes from the regularity of the growth process across cities. Many authors test the validity of different distributions to explain the population size of the cities (Loannides, Overman 2003, Nitsch 2005, Newman 2005, Giesen et al 2010, Gómez-Déniz et al 2014, Gómez-Déniz, Calderín-Ojeda 2015, Shujuan 2016, Luckstead, Devadoss 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%