2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0075426900002950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parodic inconsistency: some problems in theBatrakhomyomakhia

Abstract: Abstract:This article argues that several problems of character identification in theBatrakhomyomakhiashould be considered not as matters of textual criticism, to be solved by emendation, excision or transposition, but as authentic features of the poem's parodic engagement with the text of Homer and its scholarship. This engagement comprises another reason for considering the Hellenistic period as the most likelyterminus post quemfor the poem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The first article to engage fully with the BM on these terms was Vine (1986). Most (1993), Sens (2006) and Kelly (2009) and (2014) all continue and extend the same approach. Glei concludes that a deliberate reference to Homeric resurrections was probably beyond the BM poet's abilities ((1984) 176), but there is no reason why this should be so.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 The first article to engage fully with the BM on these terms was Vine (1986). Most (1993), Sens (2006) and Kelly (2009) and (2014) all continue and extend the same approach. Glei concludes that a deliberate reference to Homeric resurrections was probably beyond the BM poet's abilities ((1984) 176), but there is no reason why this should be so.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Cf. Kelly (2009) This ongoing and apparently deliberate confusion over whether characters are alive or dead is not a feature of the Batrachomyomachia as a whole; it does not occur anywhere in the first 200 lines, where the poet has other jokes to tell. Yet within the space of 60 lines -between the trumpetblast which opens the hostilities at 200 and the arrival of Meridarpax, the mouse hero who turns the tide, at 260 -one major character is certainly resurrected; at least two others probably are; and a dead character is first of all subjected to attempted murder and then defended by a comrade who is himself supposed to be dead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dating of neither text is certain, but several phenomena recommend this theory. Like the Galeomyomachia, the Batrachomyomachia is now typically considered a Hellenistic text, and some scholars have even argued that it must date to the Augustan period; 48 this range overlaps with that of the 44 On the Batrachomyomachia, see Ludwich 1896;Morenz 1954;Bliquez 1977;Wölke 1978;Glei 1984;Vine 1986;Fusillo 1988;Camerotto 1992;Most 1993;Scodel 2008;Bertolín Cebrián 2008: 95-118;Kelly 2009Kelly , 2014Hosty , 2017Hosty , 2020Hosty , 2021Sticker 2017;Christensen and Robinson 2018;Gäertner 2020, inter alia. 45 E.g., the Batrachomyomachia resists using whole lines from Homeric epic, which the Galeomyomachia does twice just in its surviving fragments (13,58).…”
Section: The Galeomyomachia's Literary Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…283 Kelly (2009) argues, for example, that some narrative inconsistencies found in the Batrachomyomachia − the reappearance of three previously-dead characters (e.g., Psicharpax, who dies at 86-99 and then reappears alive and well at 234-246); the drowning of an already-dead mouse (232); and a character who changes species from a frog (232-235) to a mouse (252-253) − are actually parodies of Homeric inconsistencies and demonstrate the poet's engagement with the debates around these inconsistencies found in Homeric scholarship. See also Most 1993: 37-38;Hosty 2017: 136.…”
Section: The Literary Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%