1988
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1094-1099.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial characterization of a bovine group A rotavirus with a short genome electropherotype

Abstract: A group A rotavirus (ID isolate) recovered from a diarrheic beef calf possessed a short genome electropherotype. This short genome electropherotype was a stable characteristic of the ID isolate as it remained unchanged through 3 passages in gnotobiotic calves or through 19 passages in MA104 cell cultures. Subgroup analysis with monoclonal antibodies in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay established that the isolate was a subgroup 1 rotavirus. Neutralization tests demonstrated that this isolate was a distinct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from PAGE analysis showing that none of the 25 PAGE positive samples had the vaccine virus electropherotype agreed with a previous report which suggested that the vaccine was probably not the cause of rotaviral diarrhea, and it was frequently inefficacious in preventing the infections in the herds [14]. Short electropherotype rotaviruses similar to the rotaviruses previously reported in humans, rabbits, pigs and calves [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] were found in all day 1 PAGE positive and most of day 7 PAGE positive samples obtained from calves while long electropherotype rotaviruses were found at days 7 and 14. Regardless of their electropherotypes, the presence of these short and long electropherotype rotaviruses might be due to their antigenic difference from common rotaviruses contaminating the farm environment; thus, they were able to evade passive immunity.…”
Section: Pagesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results from PAGE analysis showing that none of the 25 PAGE positive samples had the vaccine virus electropherotype agreed with a previous report which suggested that the vaccine was probably not the cause of rotaviral diarrhea, and it was frequently inefficacious in preventing the infections in the herds [14]. Short electropherotype rotaviruses similar to the rotaviruses previously reported in humans, rabbits, pigs and calves [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] were found in all day 1 PAGE positive and most of day 7 PAGE positive samples obtained from calves while long electropherotype rotaviruses were found at days 7 and 14. Regardless of their electropherotypes, the presence of these short and long electropherotype rotaviruses might be due to their antigenic difference from common rotaviruses contaminating the farm environment; thus, they were able to evade passive immunity.…”
Section: Pagesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The high incidence of short electropherotype group A rotavirus in calves was unexpected. A few cases of short electropherotype and a mixture of short and long electropherotype rotaviruses were previously reported in diarrheic calves [12,13,15,16].…”
Section: Pagementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Workers Animal Diseases, Chicago, Ill., abstract no. 84, 1987) and Idaho (35). The latter virus isolate from Idaho (35) was shown to be distinct serotypically from the NCDV group of bovine rotaviruses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these distinct RNA patterns can arise by different mechanisms, RNA profiles cannot be used as the sole criterion for classification of a virus strain in a specific group (i.e., A to F). Instead, RNA profiles combined with group A ELISA reactivity should be used for preliminary characterization of non-group A rotaviruses (96,249,309 (1,22,41,117,229,298,325,333,341). However, because RNA patterns usually remain constant for individual virus strains, RNA analysis is useful for molecular epidemiology studies to monitor virus outbreaks and transmission.…”
Section: Genome Analysis For Virus Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%