2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial discharge pattern recognition using variable predictive model‐based class discrimination with kernel partial least squares regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simultaneity of the signals during the measurement process makes the PRPD difficult to interpret even for experts in the field, because noise signals without phase correlations can often reach higher magnitudes than those of the PD [7], [10], [21], [22]. This problem has gradually increased due to a higher use of systems based on power electronics, such as switched-mode power supplies, frequency inverters, rectifiers, inverters or other electrical-electronic devices capable of generating some type of similar switching [17], [23]. Likewise, in many measurement processes it is very common to find simultaneous presence of multiple PD, which causes the PRPD measured in any real equipment or test object to be of complex interpretation since certain less harmful sources with greater amplitudes can hide the presence of more critical sources, such as internal PD, (whose presence can indicate accelerated deterioration of equipment insulation) [9], [13], [18], [24]- [29].…”
Section: Classification and Identification Of Pd Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simultaneity of the signals during the measurement process makes the PRPD difficult to interpret even for experts in the field, because noise signals without phase correlations can often reach higher magnitudes than those of the PD [7], [10], [21], [22]. This problem has gradually increased due to a higher use of systems based on power electronics, such as switched-mode power supplies, frequency inverters, rectifiers, inverters or other electrical-electronic devices capable of generating some type of similar switching [17], [23]. Likewise, in many measurement processes it is very common to find simultaneous presence of multiple PD, which causes the PRPD measured in any real equipment or test object to be of complex interpretation since certain less harmful sources with greater amplitudes can hide the presence of more critical sources, such as internal PD, (whose presence can indicate accelerated deterioration of equipment insulation) [9], [13], [18], [24]- [29].…”
Section: Classification and Identification Of Pd Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, other PD identification techniques based on machine learning (ML) have begun to be used with very good results [12]- [17]. Although the application of these techniques is very wide, many works have been focused on direct identification after the information obtained from the signals emitted by each type of PD source [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have explored the development of these comprehensive AI-powered methods for detecting and classifying partial discharge signals. These methods include those based on correlation coefficients [47,48], cluster analysis [49][50][51], support vector machines [52][53][54][55][56], and neural networks [49,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method yields high recognition along with a reduction in data storage and processing time [20]. Several classifiers such as forward back propagation neural network (BPNN) [21], hidden Markov model [22], fuzzy logic controller [23], rough set theory [24,25], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [26], spectral features [27], least square regression [28,29], wavelet based features [30] and support vector machines (SVMs) [31][32][33] were used for PD classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%