2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial discharges location in transformer winding using wavelets and Kullback–Leibler divergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several techniques for locating P Ds, based mainly on the high frequency current signals captured at the accessible endings of the windings, have been proposed in recent years. As examples, Nafar et al (2011) made use of correlation coefficients between waveforms to determine the point of occurrence of the P Ds; Homaei et al (2014) used unsupervised neuro-fuzzy networks, by means of orthogonal transformation of the received signals; Guillen et al (2016) employed Wavelet-Laplace functions in conjunction with Hellinger's distance calculation; Rahman et al (2016) used a combination of linear and digital filters, based on wavelet coefficients and the main components of the signals; Gonçalves Júnior et al (2018) applied regression models using statistical features from terminal currents of an experimental winding; among others. Although all these methods present significant performances, with a high percentage of hits for the P Ds location, the vast majority was evaluated for only one type of transformer windings, being the applicability in other windings structures thus unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques for locating P Ds, based mainly on the high frequency current signals captured at the accessible endings of the windings, have been proposed in recent years. As examples, Nafar et al (2011) made use of correlation coefficients between waveforms to determine the point of occurrence of the P Ds; Homaei et al (2014) used unsupervised neuro-fuzzy networks, by means of orthogonal transformation of the received signals; Guillen et al (2016) employed Wavelet-Laplace functions in conjunction with Hellinger's distance calculation; Rahman et al (2016) used a combination of linear and digital filters, based on wavelet coefficients and the main components of the signals; Gonçalves Júnior et al (2018) applied regression models using statistical features from terminal currents of an experimental winding; among others. Although all these methods present significant performances, with a high percentage of hits for the P Ds location, the vast majority was evaluated for only one type of transformer windings, being the applicability in other windings structures thus unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDs localization allows maintenance plans to be more oriented and efficient. In recent years, there has been a strong trend towards the development of new methods for the detection and location of partial discharges for various applications in electrical engineering [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. There are existing detection methods, electrical and chemical ones that have proven to be reliable diagnostic tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%