2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Nephrectomy Without Renal Ischemia Using an Electromagnetic Thermal Surgery System in a Porcine Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MWS has the potential to avoid the limitations of the microwave coagulator because the scissor blades can be precisely controlled under operator’s vision, while the renal tissue is coagulated by microwaves radiated between the scissor blades with an arbitrary transition timing based on the bleeding condition. Our off-clamp LPN technique using MWS recorded lower BL compared with off-clamp open PN using ultrasonic 31 or radiofrequency ablation devices 31 in similar porcine renal resections reported previously. Moreover, even though the proposed technique requires no clamping, its RT and BL were lower than those in on-clamp LPNs 32,33 in which renal bleeding was controlled with renorrhaphy, 32,33 renorrhaphy with hemostatic agents, 33 or electrocautery with hemostatic agents, 32 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The MWS has the potential to avoid the limitations of the microwave coagulator because the scissor blades can be precisely controlled under operator’s vision, while the renal tissue is coagulated by microwaves radiated between the scissor blades with an arbitrary transition timing based on the bleeding condition. Our off-clamp LPN technique using MWS recorded lower BL compared with off-clamp open PN using ultrasonic 31 or radiofrequency ablation devices 31 in similar porcine renal resections reported previously. Moreover, even though the proposed technique requires no clamping, its RT and BL were lower than those in on-clamp LPNs 32,33 in which renal bleeding was controlled with renorrhaphy, 32,33 renorrhaphy with hemostatic agents, 33 or electrocautery with hemostatic agents, 32 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Even though hilar clamping was not performed, the off-clamp sutureless LPN using MWS ( 21 ) recorded shorter PT and lesser BL compared to porcine on-clamp LPNs ( 37 , 38 ), in which renal bleeding was controlled with renal suturing ( 37 , 38 ), renal suturing with hemostatic agents ( 38 ), or electrocautery with hemostatic agents ( 37 ), respectively. In addition, its BL ( 21 ) was lesser than that of off-clamp open PN using ultrasonic ( 39 ) or radiofrequency ablation devices ( 39 ), in similar porcine renal resections reported previously. To our knowledge, the cost of MWS is lower than that of other devices usually employed for dissection in conventional LPN, such as bipolar radiofrequency or ultrasonic devices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%