2009
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-93-1-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Sequence and Survey Analysis Identify a Multipartite, Negative-Sense RNA Virus Associated with Fig Mosaic

Abstract: RNA and nucleotide sequence-based analyses were used to identify viruses in fig mosaic (FM)-affected fig (Ficus carica) trees. Nucleotide sequence analyses of 267 cloned cDNAs identified sequences corresponding to four viruses representing four distinct taxa from fig trees in California. Virus sequences corresponding to members of the family Closteroviridae were most common (55 sequences). We also found two sequences for an Umbravirus, one sequence corresponding to a Luteovirus-associated RNA, and two sequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although emaravirus genomes are multipartite in nature, individual members differ substantially in the number of genomic RNAs they possess. European mountain ash ringspot-associated virus (EMARaV), the type species of the Emaravirus genus (2,3), and Rose rosette virus (RRV) (4) are quadripartite; Pigeonpea sterility mosaic virus (PPSMV) (5,6) and Raspberry leaf blotch virus (RLBV) (7) are pentapartite; and Fig mosaic virus (FMV) (8)(9)(10)) is a hexapartite virus. The diverse number of genomic RNA segments suggests that emaraviruses evolve by acquiring additional genomic RNAs in order to facilitate precise virus-host and virus-vector interactions for virus survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although emaravirus genomes are multipartite in nature, individual members differ substantially in the number of genomic RNAs they possess. European mountain ash ringspot-associated virus (EMARaV), the type species of the Emaravirus genus (2,3), and Rose rosette virus (RRV) (4) are quadripartite; Pigeonpea sterility mosaic virus (PPSMV) (5,6) and Raspberry leaf blotch virus (RLBV) (7) are pentapartite; and Fig mosaic virus (FMV) (8)(9)(10)) is a hexapartite virus. The diverse number of genomic RNA segments suggests that emaraviruses evolve by acquiring additional genomic RNAs in order to facilitate precise virus-host and virus-vector interactions for virus survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each anti-genomic segment is monocistronic. RNA 1 encodes for an RdRp, RNA 2 encodes a putative glycoprotein precursor, RNA 3 encodes a nucleocapsid (NP) protein, RNA 4 encodes a putative movement protein, and RNA 5 and RNA 6 encode proteins of unknown functions (13,24,25,52). The genome organization and the deduced amino acid sequences of FMV-encoded proteins are similar to those of another eriophyid mite-transmitted virus, European mountain ash ringspot associated virus (EMARAV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome organization and the deduced amino acid sequences of FMV-encoded proteins are similar to those of another eriophyid mite-transmitted virus, European mountain ash ringspot associated virus (EMARAV). Based on this, the genus Emaravirus (unassigned family) was proposed which contains EMARAV and tentatively three other species, one of which is FMV (12,24,38,52).In this study, we estimated the genetic variation and population structure of FMV isolates collected from diverse worldwide locations by analyzing the nucleotide sequences of four regions, one each of genomic RNAs 1, 2, 3, and 4. The roles of the evolutionary factors recombination, selection, genetic drift, and gene flow were examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only recently the causal agent of FMD, a multipartite single-stranded negative-sense RNA virus belonging to the genus Emaravirus, was identified. Although Koch's postulates remain to be fulfilled due to the difficulty of sap inoculation (Elbeaino et al, 2009a), the strong association of FMV with FMD (Walia et al, 2009) and mite transmissibility of FMV (Çaglayan et al, 2010) Walia et al, 2009;Çağlayan et al, 2010;Ishikawa et al, 2012, Elbeshey andCaglar et al, 2011;El Air et al, 2015;Aldhebiani et al, 2015;Shahmirzaie et al, 2010).…”
Section: Fig Main Pests and Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%