2016
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zow097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality

Abstract: In animal societies, behavioral idiosyncrasies of the individuals often guide which tasks they should perform. Such personality-specific task participation can increase individual task efficiency, thereby improving group performance. While several recent studies have documented group-level benefits of within-group behavioral (i.e., personality) diversity, how these benefits are realized at the individual level is unclear. Here we probe the individual-level benefits of personality-driven task participation in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, adding just one bold individual to a laboratory colony of all shy individuals increases the number of colony members that respond to prey by >400% and increases the mass gained by other colony members by 200% [30, 33]. Such effects on colony behavior and performance persist even weeks after bold individuals are removed from groups, thus conveying that their “social influence” over groups is enduring [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, adding just one bold individual to a laboratory colony of all shy individuals increases the number of colony members that respond to prey by >400% and increases the mass gained by other colony members by 200% [30, 33]. Such effects on colony behavior and performance persist even weeks after bold individuals are removed from groups, thus conveying that their “social influence” over groups is enduring [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, bold individuals are not consistently able to secure more resources than their shy counterparts, nor are they more food deprived, and colonies at arid sites are not in poorer body condition. Instead, shy colony members at arid sites actually benefit by the presence of bold individuals because they enhance colony survival (Figure 1), reproductive output (Data S1), and the collective mass gain of shy colony members [30, 33]. Finally, the social dynamics observed at arid sites are seemingly unresponsive to manipulations to resource availability (see additional results in Figure S1) [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the physiological demands of a bold personality may still be the driving force for the eagerness of such chicks to peck at aposematic prey. Bold individuals often have a higher metabolic rate than shy ones (Biro & Stamps, 2008), are at greater risk of starvation (Lichtenstein et al., 2017), and thus may need to be less catholic in their feeding, showing greater resistance to learning to avoid noxious prey (Exnerová et al., 2010). Clearly, the experimental disentanglement of predator personality, early development and motivation to feed discriminately is both relevant to our understanding of the evolution of mimicry and a complex challenge worthy of further research effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal personality determines aspects of individuals' ecology such as individual variation in social behaviour (Lichtenstein et al, 2016; Wright, Holbrook, & Pruitt, 2014) space use (Pearish, Hostert, & Bell, 2013; Wilson & McLaughlin, 2007) and diet (Wilson, Coleman, Clark, & Biederman, 1993). The personality literature has long argued that a comprehensive understanding of an individual's behaviour requires a multitrait approach (Sih, Bell, & Johnson, 2004; Sih, Cote, Evans, Fogarty, & Pruitt, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%