2016
DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2016.1243229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation in job-related training in European countries: the impact of skill supply and demand characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
20

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
25
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, those companies generally accepting young adults without former vocational education and training, and therefore having the potential to offer second-chance training, are bigger companies with more than 200 employees, whereas the willingness to apply such CVET (second-chance training and/or CVET for older people) strategies decreases with the size of the company (Troltsch, 2012, p. 2-3). Other studies found this relation between the size of the company and the offer of CVET as well (Bassanini et al, 2007;Neubäumer and Kohaut, 2007;Walden, 2007;Brown and Sitzmann, 2011;Desjardins, 2014;CEDEFOP, 2015;Zwick, 2015;Saar and Räis, 2017). It is assumed that larger firms are more able to offer CVET than smaller firms because they have potentially more employees to send to a CVET, can offer to pay for CVET more easily, have larger and more diverse department structures to face changes more frequently, make learning processes more important, and enable the application of what has been learned.…”
Section: Reasons For and Barriers To Offering Cvet By Employersmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, those companies generally accepting young adults without former vocational education and training, and therefore having the potential to offer second-chance training, are bigger companies with more than 200 employees, whereas the willingness to apply such CVET (second-chance training and/or CVET for older people) strategies decreases with the size of the company (Troltsch, 2012, p. 2-3). Other studies found this relation between the size of the company and the offer of CVET as well (Bassanini et al, 2007;Neubäumer and Kohaut, 2007;Walden, 2007;Brown and Sitzmann, 2011;Desjardins, 2014;CEDEFOP, 2015;Zwick, 2015;Saar and Räis, 2017). It is assumed that larger firms are more able to offer CVET than smaller firms because they have potentially more employees to send to a CVET, can offer to pay for CVET more easily, have larger and more diverse department structures to face changes more frequently, make learning processes more important, and enable the application of what has been learned.…”
Section: Reasons For and Barriers To Offering Cvet By Employersmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…From the point of view of an employer, one of the goals of CVET is to remain competitive (Desjardins, 2014;Zwick, 2015;Saar and Räis, 2017). As already mentioned in the introduction, CVET of existing workers offers great potential to close gaps in the filling of vacancies.…”
Section: Reasons For and Barriers To Offering Cvet By Employersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has often been attributed to inequalities in initial education: those who received little initial schooling also receive less further training. However, recent research challenged this interpretation by showing that participation in further training is mainly determined by characteristics of workplaces and occupations and less by individual resources (Schindler et al 2011;Görlitz and Tamm 2016;Saar and Räis 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), but also by many other factors that are relevant macrosocial predictors of participation in empirical analyses (Boeren, 2017;Desjardins, 2017;Rubenson, 2018). The most common ones are: (1) welfare state measures to support adult involvement in NFE and eliminate barriers to it (Desjardins & Rubenson, 2013;Roosmaa & Saar, 2010Rubenson & Desjardins, 2009); (2) restrictivity/openness of the adult education system (Saar, Ure, & Desjardins, 2013); (3) current knowledge and skills requirements in major labor market segments (Rees, 2013;Saar & Räis, 2017); (4) alternatively, it may be a different combination of all three previous sets of factors (Green, 2006(Green, , 2011Verdier, 2017Verdier, , 2018. Denmark 56 38 53 61 44 -6 Finland 58 51 51 61 55 -1 Sweden 53 69 67 61 57 2 UK 44 40 24 51 48 2 Norway 48 50 57 29 55 3 Poland 14 19 21 32 23 13 Czechia 27 35 35 47 45 14 Italy 22 20 34 31 40 16 Belgium 21 34 33 46 41 18 Germany 18 43 49 50 50 29 Note: (data: IALS , 2000;PIAAC, 2013;<...>…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%