2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 10% increase in the quantity of cowpea sold increases the food expenditure and income by 1.6% and 0.7%, respectively. These results are consistent with the results found by Montalbano et al (2018) and Muriithi and Matz (2015) who found that maize and vegetable market participation increased food consumption, nutrition and total household income in Uganda and Kenya, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 10% increase in the quantity of cowpea sold increases the food expenditure and income by 1.6% and 0.7%, respectively. These results are consistent with the results found by Montalbano et al (2018) and Muriithi and Matz (2015) who found that maize and vegetable market participation increased food consumption, nutrition and total household income in Uganda and Kenya, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Others have gone beyond determinants and examined the effects of market participation on income, food security, and poverty (Muriithi & Matz, 2015; Ogutu & Qaim, 2019; Radchenko & Corral, 2018). Yet, to our knowledge, none of these studies considered the associated benefits of different market choices (rural and urban) on food security and welfare of smallholder farmers, with the exception of a study by Montalbano, Pietrelli, and Salvatici (2018). In this study, a household was considered to have participated in the market if they sold any amount of cowpea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that over 70% of the world's poor still derive their livelihoods from agriculture or agriculture-dependent activities, the benefits from In All Shapes and Colors: Varieties of Contract Farming modernized AVCs are increasingly recognized as one of the fastest ways to achieve poverty reduction in developing countries (Byerlee et al 2007). Recent empirical studies also highlight positive welfare effects of farmer participation in AVCs (Barrett et al 2012;Bellemare 2012;Wang et al 2014;Montalbano, Pietrelli, and Salvatici 2017;Bellemare and Novak 2017). The extent of participation in agricultural value chains by smallholder farmers in developing countries, however, is relatively low, especially in sub-Saharan Africa-the region trailing most behind in terms of both economic development and integration in international markets (Maertens, Minten, and Swinnen 2012).…”
Section: Challenges To Modernized Agriculture Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that income-based policies can still play a role in the fight against hunger, but that targeted programs are needed to promote nutritionally valuable and healthy diets. Montalbano et al [18] assess the link between market chain participation and food security which is characterized by conflicting evidence. Their goal is to deal with this issue at different points of the commercialization chain by providing a sound identification strategy using the Uganda World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) panel data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%