Participation, Power and Beliefs Shape Local Food and Nutrition Policy

Abstract

Community participation is believed to hold a number of benefits, including the incorporation of local knowledge in planning, generation of greater support for and sustainability of local actions and being consistent with democratic values. These claimed benefits were examined in upstate New York, where 3-d participatory planning events were convened in each of six communities, focusing on desired changes in the local food system. A variety of qualitative and quantitative methods were used to assess the following: 1) local values, interests and beliefs (viewpoints) related to food and the food system before and after the planning events; 2) fairness and effectiveness in agenda setting; and 3) implementation of actions during the 2 y following the events. Despite marked variation in viewpoints, participants readily agreed on desired changes in the local food system during the events and they considered the process to be a fair and positive experience. However, the action agendas, follow-up actions and changes in viewpoints after the events displayed systematic tendencies to deviate from revealed common interests or interests of disenfranchised participants. This reflected differences in the fairness and effectiveness of participation during and after the events, established agendas and preferences of local institutions and a variety of market and regulatory barriers.

Multi‐level rural community engagement in health

“…3,10 It includes notions of personal development, consciousness-raising and social action, 11,14 but disadvantaged groups even in developed countries are unlikely to be able to participate equally or meaningfully, 2,11,15 and those with power in the community are likely to influence the agenda at the expense of disadvantaged groups. 2,7 Community development approaches to health do not always empower. A contributions approach that considers participation as voluntary contributions to a project, rather than decision-making, and an instrumental approach that defines health as a commodity and those who use it as consumers, are seen in Australia.…”

Drawing Toward Transformation and Action in a Forgotten Barrio

“…Further, studies and reports from different parts of the world and different settings suggest the SC has the potential to create powerful transformative results (Alvarez & E. Emery, 2000;Concepcion, 1999;Granata, 2005;Jimenez-Guzman, 2008;Pelletier, McCullum, Kraak, & Asher, 2003).…”

The new frontiers of food security. A prospective review

“…En France, la plupart des livres et des articles traitant de cette problématique transversalequi embrasse un large spectre, depuis la variabilité des conditions de production jusqu'à la consommation individuelles des denréesrelèvent, surtout depuis une décennie, des sciences économiques et des sciences humaines et sociales, telles que l'anthropologie, la géographie, l'histoire, les sciences politiques ou la sociologie, avec un traitement nettement plus qualitatif de l'information. Parallèlement, la nutrition publique a peu à peu élargi son champ d'investigation à ces questions politiques et socio-économiques (Pelletier et al, 2003 ;Hadley et al, 2011 ;Nanama et Frongillo, 2012 (Weingärtner, 2006). Cette dernière s'attache en effet surtout à mesurer des états en fonction d'objectifs et de normes à atteindre (Touzard et Temple, 2012).…”