2007
DOI: 10.1134/s0015462807030118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle and drop dynamics in the flow behind a shock wave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single drop of water d = 2-3 mm crossed the laser synchronization beam on the way to the channel axis and triggered the shock tube. The duration of the quasi-stationary flow behind the shock wave front is 500-700 microseconds [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single drop of water d = 2-3 mm crossed the laser synchronization beam on the way to the channel axis and triggered the shock tube. The duration of the quasi-stationary flow behind the shock wave front is 500-700 microseconds [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most effective testing of numerical technology is modeling in the calculation of the conditions realized in shock wave experiments and comparing the results with the maximum number of parameters. These can be integral quantitative parameters, such as the dynamics of acceleration and deformation of a drop [9,10], the period of induction of destruction [11]. This may include structural features that indicate the flow patterns of the droplet, the type of instability of its surface, and the deformation scenario, the physical mechanism of destruction, and the nature of the liquid erosion [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, C x of droplets due to deformation and erosion can differ substantially from the C D of a solid sphere [9][10][11], which has been well studied for various regimes in terms of the Re number [11]. Here, according to [9,10], we assume C x~2 .3 C D~ 1 -1.5 from subsonic to supersonic velocities. Figure 3 shows the results of measuring the fluid velocity (LDA) and the average droplet size ("Malvern Spraytec") on the axis of a two-phase jet, depending on the distance from the cut of the nozzle x for different flow regimes.…”
Section: Experiments and Parameters Of Gas-liquid Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The known velocity profile of the liquid phase makes it possible to determine the droplet acceleration by the gas flow as a measure of the aerodynamic force for a known mass (size), and in terms of acceleration, in turn, the droplet size can be estimated under the assumption of sphericity. Indeed, from the equation of motion of the droplet upon a sudden entry into the flow, the acceleration a depends on the droplet diameter d as follows [9][10][11]:…”
Section: Experiments and Parameters Of Gas-liquid Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5]. The case in study of shock ejecting in liquids and liquid metals with smooth and mirror-like surfaces is of special interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%