2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.879435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle detection on flat surfaces

Abstract: Since 2006 EUV Lithographic tools have been available for testing purposes giving a boost to the development of fab infrastructure for EUV masks. The absence of a pellicle makes the EUV reticles extremely vulnerable to particles. Therefore, the fab infrastructure for masks must meet very strict particle requirements. It is expected that all new equipment must be qualified on particles before it can be put into operation. This qualification requirement increases the need for a low cost method for particle detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they still suffer from their complexity and lack of speed, since most of them utilize multiple beams and detectors and rely on correlations between them [8]. Moreover, in most cases the desired detection sensitivity is achieved only by using wavelengths shorter than Ultraviolet B (280-315 nm) [8] or high power [9], either of which are often harmful for organic substrates [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they still suffer from their complexity and lack of speed, since most of them utilize multiple beams and detectors and rely on correlations between them [8]. Moreover, in most cases the desired detection sensitivity is achieved only by using wavelengths shorter than Ultraviolet B (280-315 nm) [8] or high power [9], either of which are often harmful for organic substrates [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both samples are shown in the RapidNano scan-box. Figure 3 (left photo) shows an image of the "wafer sample" inside the scan-box of the RapidNano [6,7] (defect detection system by TNO, see also chapter 2.2). Wafer level particle analysis was performed on the "wafer sample" using SEM and EDX in those cases where added particles detected were of a larger size.…”
Section: Samples and Qualification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added PRP specification value is defined to 0.08 for particles larger 60nm (PSL equivalent) or less than 2 particles added for the 25 total handling paths in the InSync tool (see figure 4, qualification routing #4). These test cycles are were designed according to the principles of acceptance sampling [6,8,9]. In pre-qualification runs, the adder level of the manual transfer of the samples (hand carried in the Dual-Pod System) between the InSync tool and the RapidNano inspection system and the contribution of the Dual Pod and the measurement sequence itself was determined to result in a total adder PRP value of 0.05 (particle size larger 60nm PSL equivalent): This value was considered for the up-coming qualification experiments as the background particle adder level.…”
Section: Samples and Qualification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dark-field technique is not limited by diffraction and background noise is avoided by selecting the angle of illumination that is different than the angle(s) of detection. However, if the particles are very small, the scattering signal is very low and, to achieve high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a high illumination power is often required [4]. This is particularly challenging in the detection of low scattering particles such as polystyrene latex (PSL) nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%