1998
DOI: 10.1029/97jd03626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle microphysics and chemistry in remotely observed mountain polar stratospheric clouds

Abstract: Abstract. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) at 22-26 km were observed over the Norwegian mountains by airborne lidar on January 15, 1995. Simulations using a mesoscale model reveal that they were caused by mountain-induced gravity waves. The clouds had a highly detailed filamentary structure with bands as thin as 100 m in the vertical, and moved insignificantly over 4 hours, suggesting them to be quasi-stationary. The aircraft flight path was parallel or close to parallel with the wind at cloud level. Such a q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
252
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
252
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ice PSCs are formed at synoptic-scale temperatures of up to 4-10 K above T ice . NAT particles are observed further downstream of the Antarctic Peninsula, which is consistent with the ice particles serving as condensation nuclei for NAT formation (Carslaw et al, 1998a;Höpfner et al, 2006b;Eckermann et al, 2009). Although mountain wave activity is most frequent at the Antarctic Peninsula (Hoffmann et al, 2016a), other orographic features in Antarctica can also play a role in PSC formation.…”
Section: A Survey Of Gravity-wave-induced Psc Formation Eventssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The ice PSCs are formed at synoptic-scale temperatures of up to 4-10 K above T ice . NAT particles are observed further downstream of the Antarctic Peninsula, which is consistent with the ice particles serving as condensation nuclei for NAT formation (Carslaw et al, 1998a;Höpfner et al, 2006b;Eckermann et al, 2009). Although mountain wave activity is most frequent at the Antarctic Peninsula (Hoffmann et al, 2016a), other orographic features in Antarctica can also play a role in PSC formation.…”
Section: A Survey Of Gravity-wave-induced Psc Formation Eventssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Figure 1c depicts the averaged differences between temperatures at ILAS-II measurement locations inside the polar vortex and the corresponding TNAT as white contour lines of T. Temperatures at 22 km in June were 0 2 K warmer on average than TNAT. It is well-known that STS droplets form at 3 5 K colder than TNAT (e.g., Carslaw et al 1994), and NAT particles would also form at temperatures several degrees colder than TNAT (Tabazadeh et al 2001) or at even lower temperatures (Carslaw et al 1998). Therefore, a high probability of PSC formation (PPSC) cannot be anticipated in June even though PT(NAT) was relatively large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspherical particles, such as ice crystals, are approximated as prolate ("cigar-like") spheroids with aspect ratio A = a/b (the ratio of the equatorial to polar lengths) and volume V = 4/3 π a 2 b, which is set equal to the volume of the ice particles calculated by the microphysical model. Calculations were then made using a T-matrix light scattering algorithm (Mishchenko, 1991;Carslaw et al, 1998) with a refractive index of ice of 1.31 at 455 and 870 nm with spheroid shape. The ice particles are clearly aspherical.…”
Section: Microphysical/optical Column Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%