2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijbic.2012.047238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimisation with stochastic ranking for constrained numerical and engineering benchmark problems

Abstract: Most of the real world science and engineering optimisation problems are non-linear and constrained. This paper presents a hybrid algorithm by integrating particle swarm optimisation with stochastic ranking for solving standard constrained numerical and engineering benchmark problems. Stochastic ranking technique that uses bubble sort mechanism for ranking the solutions and maintains a balance between the objective and the penalty function. The faster convergence of particle swarm optimisation and the ranking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the performance and effectiveness of the SRIFA, these results are compared with five metaheuristic algorithms. These algorithms are stochastic ranking with a particle-swarm-optimization (SRPSO) [46], self adaptive mix of particle-swarm-optimization (SAMO-PSO) [47], upgraded firefly algorithm (UFA) [37], an ensemble of constraint handling techniques for evolutionary-programming (ECHT-EP2) [48] and a novel differential-evolution algorithm (NDE) [49]. To evaluate proper comparisons of these algorithms, the same number of function evaluations (NFEs = 240,000) were chosen.…”
Section: Comparison Of Srifa With Other Niasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the performance and effectiveness of the SRIFA, these results are compared with five metaheuristic algorithms. These algorithms are stochastic ranking with a particle-swarm-optimization (SRPSO) [46], self adaptive mix of particle-swarm-optimization (SAMO-PSO) [47], upgraded firefly algorithm (UFA) [37], an ensemble of constraint handling techniques for evolutionary-programming (ECHT-EP2) [48] and a novel differential-evolution algorithm (NDE) [49]. To evaluate proper comparisons of these algorithms, the same number of function evaluations (NFEs = 240,000) were chosen.…”
Section: Comparison Of Srifa With Other Niasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proposed SRIFA approach is compared to SRPSO [46], MVDE [54], BA [44], MBA [55], JAYA [56], PVS [57], UABC [58], IPSO [59] and AFA [33]. The comparative results obtained by SRIFA for nine NIAs are given in Table 11.…”
Section: Tension/compression Spring Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Calculate the boundaries [ , ] of the current population according to (7) = min ( , ) , = max ( , ) .…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several years, some population-based random optimization techniques have been widely used to solve optimization problems, such as genetic algorithms (GA) [1], evolutionary programming (EP) [2], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [3], differential evolution (DE) [4], ant colony optimization (ACO) [5], and artificial bee colony (ABC) [6]. Due to PSO's simple concept, easy implementation, yet effective, has been widely applied to various optimization areas [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, researchers have shown increasing interest in utilising stochastic algorithms that can tackle these problems efficiently. Several variants of meta-heuristic algorithms have been proposed during the past few years to cope with the constrained and unconstrained optimisation problems (Afshar, 2007;Ali et al, 2012;Chatterjee et al, 2012;He and Wang, 2007;Kashan, 2011;Ji et al, 2006;Karaboga and Akay, 2011;Noman and Iba, 2011;Rao et al, 2011;Segundo et al, 2012;Srivastava et al, 2012;Tsoulos, 2009;Yang and Deb, 2012;Yuchi and Kim, 2006). ) and the type of variables used in the problem (integer, real, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%