2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112001003470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle–wall collisions in a viscous fluid

Abstract: This paper presents experimental measurements of the approach and rebound of a particle colliding with a wall in a viscous fluid. The particle's trajectory was controlled by setting the initial inclination angle of a pendulum immersed in a fluid. The resulting collisions were monitored using a high-speed video camera. The diameters of the particles ranged from 3 to 12 mm, and the ratio of the particle density to fluid density varied from 1.2 to 7.8. The experiments were performed using a thick glass or Lucite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
288
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
33
288
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle decelerates before it rebounds. This deceleration prior to impact was also observed in the experiments of Joseph et al (2001) and the simulations of Ardekani & Rangel (2008). As the gap decreases to less than δ ss , the elastic force stops the approach of the particle.…”
Section: Particle Velocitysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The particle decelerates before it rebounds. This deceleration prior to impact was also observed in the experiments of Joseph et al (2001) and the simulations of Ardekani & Rangel (2008). As the gap decreases to less than δ ss , the elastic force stops the approach of the particle.…”
Section: Particle Velocitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As a sphere approaches the wall, the hydrodynamic pressure increases in the fluid layer between the two solid surfaces; with the increased pressure, the surfaces deform and collision happens either through the layer of fluid between the surfaces or between the roughness elements (see Davis et al 1986;Barnocky & Davis 1989;Joseph et al 2001). In addition as the fluid is compressed, its density and viscosity may increases, which may further limit the approach of the surfaces.…”
Section: Elastic Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note, however, that the asymptotic expansions have been derived for a perfectly smooth and inelastic sphere/wall and are based on the assumption that the Stokes equations still hold for the flow in the intervening film when → 0. From experiments it is known that surface roughness elements of the sphere/wall cause actual sphere-sphere/wall contact when the gap width ( R) is of the order of the typical size of the surface roughness elements (Joseph et al 2006). This will hamper further drainage of the intervening film and the drainage process will eventually stop when many roughness elements have made contact with each other.…”
Section: Appendix Details On Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%