1993
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning and Combining Data in Phylogenetic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
488
1
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 828 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
488
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The 50% majority-rule consensus tree of the remaining trees was inferred and posterior probabilities were recorded for each branch. A partition homogeneity test in PAUP (Swofford, 2000) (100 replicates, with maxtrees set to 1000) was run with the datasets to establish whether or not the character partitions were heterogeneous (significance threshold value p = 0.05) (Bull et al, 1993).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 50% majority-rule consensus tree of the remaining trees was inferred and posterior probabilities were recorded for each branch. A partition homogeneity test in PAUP (Swofford, 2000) (100 replicates, with maxtrees set to 1000) was run with the datasets to establish whether or not the character partitions were heterogeneous (significance threshold value p = 0.05) (Bull et al, 1993).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree topology and clade support were used as gross measures of congruence in phylogenetic signal (Bull et al, 1993;de Queiroz et al, 1995;Wiens, 1998);…”
Section: Sequence Aligning and Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still a contentious issue as to whether data can be or should be combined. Bull et al (1993) were against combining data partitions if heterogeneity is known to exist between them, while Wiens (1998) demonstrates that localized areas of conXict between data sets may not disrupt overall analyses, and in areas of data congruence, combining data strengthens the overall accuracy of the analysis. In our study, the partition homogeneity test between the cyt b and CR revealed no signiWcant diVerences (P D 0.07 > 0.01), when using an adjusted of 0.01 as suggested by Cunningham (1997).…”
Section: 00mentioning
confidence: 99%