2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change

Abstract: Forecasts of species range shifts under climate change are fraught with uncertainties and ensemble forecasting may provide a framework to deal with such uncertainties. Here, a novel approach to partition the variance among modeled attributes, such as richness or turnover, and map sources of uncertainty in ensembles of forecasts is presented. We model the distributions of 3837 New World birds and project them into 2080. We then quantify and map the relative contribution of different sources of uncertainty from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
434
1
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 533 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
13
434
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is not the usual approach to model species distributions since it may overestimate the geographical distribution of a species introducing a great number of false positives, the presence points derived from geographical distribution atlas allow us to understand large-scale distribution patterns of species [94,95]. Nevertheless, the use of data based upon individual occurrences from surveys would not necessarily produce more accurate suitability predictions, because this kind of data may itself introduce uncertainties related to different sampling efforts, both in space and time, introducing cases of false negatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is not the usual approach to model species distributions since it may overestimate the geographical distribution of a species introducing a great number of false positives, the presence points derived from geographical distribution atlas allow us to understand large-scale distribution patterns of species [94,95]. Nevertheless, the use of data based upon individual occurrences from surveys would not necessarily produce more accurate suitability predictions, because this kind of data may itself introduce uncertainties related to different sampling efforts, both in space and time, introducing cases of false negatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected models were geographically classified for presence and absence of species by using the threshold that maximizes specificity plus sensibility, and then the consensus maps were computed from the frequency of initial models supporting the occurrence of the species in each cell of the grid. The consensual frequency is then interpreted and used in further analyses as a measure of environmental suitability [see details of the ensemble approach in Diniz-Filho et al (2009) and Collevatti et al (2012a)]. The combinations of all modelling components (12 algorithms Â5 AOGCMs) resulted in 60 consensual predictive maps for each time period.…”
Section: Ecological Niche Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para a construção dos modelos correlativos aplicamos o método de Distância Euclidiana, utilizando o software BIOENSEMBLES (veja Diniz-Filho et al, 2009;Rangel et al, 2009), o qual consiste em medir a similaridade de cada ponto de ocorrência em relação à média (ou ao centro) do espaço ecológico, gerando, assim, um envelope circular. Desta forma, os valores mais altos apresentados no mapa referem-se a locais mais distantes do nicho ótimo da espécie, ao passo que valores mais baixos representam locais mais adequados à sobrevivência da espécie e semelhantes ao nicho ótimo.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified