“…Different approach than in the EVT Package, providing non-linear dependence of πΈπΈπΈπΈ ππ upon WT depth, but addressing specific, riparian wetland environment was proposed byBaird and Maddock (2005); other, more general solution has been proposed recently byFrancΓ©s and Lubczynski (2023), where the πΈπΈ ππ and πΈπΈ ππ are simulated separately, being primarily dependent on climate forcing.The current TSA model has undergone number of relevant changes/improvements as compared to the former Sardon model (Chapter 2); these are as follow: (i) externally defined and improved πΈπΈ πΌπΌ ; to illustrate the difference between the two solutions (Table4.3), the 16-year mean πΈπΈ πΌπΌ in the TSA was 63.7 mm (11.3% ππ), whereas in the Sardon model in the same period, was only 35.2 mm (6.4% ππ); (ii) improved πππΈπΈπΈπΈ estimated as product of temporally variable πΈπΈπΈπΈ 0 and spatiotemporally variable LULC factor (πΎπΎ ππ ) derived from satellite products, replaced former πππΈπΈπΈπΈ by Jensen et al πΎπΎ π π , ππ π π , ππ ππ and WRC) of the soil samples obtained from various depths at profile B to parametrize the unsaturated zone; and (vii) improvement of state variables constraining model calibration by the additional use of four monitoring soil moisture profiles and MODIS πΈπΈπΈπΈ not used in the former Sardon model. The PRMS driving forces and their parameterization changed substantially (Table…”