2002
DOI: 10.1006/snmr.2002.0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning of Main and Side-Chain Units between Different Phases: A Solid-State 13C NMR Inversion-Recovery Cross-Polarization Study on a Homogeneous, Metallocene-Based, Ethylene-1-Octene Copolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PP crystals can instead accommodate some C2 units as defects in the structure, also reducing the crystal stability and melting temperature. Our observations on the melting peak and broadening of melting range for monolayer controls are consistent with the thermal behavior of PP and PE based copolymers containing similar molar fraction of their respective comonomers …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…PP crystals can instead accommodate some C2 units as defects in the structure, also reducing the crystal stability and melting temperature. Our observations on the melting peak and broadening of melting range for monolayer controls are consistent with the thermal behavior of PP and PE based copolymers containing similar molar fraction of their respective comonomers …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For semicrystalline, high‐density polyethylene an intermediate phase could also be proven by electron microscopy 22. It appeared on both sides of the crystalline lamellae with an intermediate mobility between the amorphous and crystalline polyethylene, as seen from spin–lattice relaxation times of 13 C solid‐state NMR22–25 analysis of internal and longitudinal acoustic Raman modes,23 X‐ray diffraction,24 and discrepancies between X‐ray and DSC crystallinity 24. The size of the intermediate phase was estimated by X‐ray and 1 H spin diffusion to be about 4.0 nm for a crystalline lamellar thickness of 25–30 nm, making it a well‐defined nanophase 24.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[32,33,[37][38][39][40] Although the effects of dipolar coupling are greatly reduced by motional averaging, as compared to the solid-state, line widths are still broader than those in the solution-state. The main drawback for melt-state NMR relates to the experimental conditions required to obtain fully quantitative spectra (error < 1%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%