2003
DOI: 10.1177/02610183030233004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnership and the Governance of Regeneration

Abstract: This article seeks to challenge understandings of partnership in order to reframe the discussion of common problems of partnership working. The very term partnership has become so common as to have no clear meaning beyond being a `nice' alternative to long tried and tested forms of governance. Yet failing to understand the complexities that are inherent in the very nature of partnership poses serious dilemmas for those engaged in such schemes. Addressing the key dilemmas identified in studies of a number of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an increasing recognition that 'social partnerships' have become the central modus operandi for business and NPOs (Mohiddin, 1998;Mancuso Brehm, 2001) by re-aligning their interactions according to societal expectations. This form of association firstly appeared between private enterprises (DiMaggio and Powel, 1983;Fombrum and Astley, 1983;Kanter, 1994;Koza and Lewin, 1998;Hemphill and Vonortas, 2003) and later between the public and private sectors commonly known as public-private partnerships (PPP) (Miller and Ahmad, 2000;Rowe and Devanney, 2003;Moon, 2004). One of the most often citied definitions of social partnerships is by Waddock (1988):…”
Section: Re-alignment With Societal Expectations: Business/nonprofit mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an increasing recognition that 'social partnerships' have become the central modus operandi for business and NPOs (Mohiddin, 1998;Mancuso Brehm, 2001) by re-aligning their interactions according to societal expectations. This form of association firstly appeared between private enterprises (DiMaggio and Powel, 1983;Fombrum and Astley, 1983;Kanter, 1994;Koza and Lewin, 1998;Hemphill and Vonortas, 2003) and later between the public and private sectors commonly known as public-private partnerships (PPP) (Miller and Ahmad, 2000;Rowe and Devanney, 2003;Moon, 2004). One of the most often citied definitions of social partnerships is by Waddock (1988):…”
Section: Re-alignment With Societal Expectations: Business/nonprofit mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to single organisations, working in partnership is of an order more complex and ambiguous, wherein inter-organisational relationships imply an array of horizontal as well as hierarchical (Pettigrew 2003), without necessarily diluting hierarchy (Rowe and Devanney 2003); where there is uncertainty about who leads and who follows (Huxham and Vangen, 2000a); where leadership can be represented by organisations rather than individuals within organisations (Stewart, 1999); and where governance arrangements (if they exist at all) may not really reflect leadership as it manifests itself in practice (Davies, 2002). Some authors point to the kinds of things that would represent successful leadership in practice.…”
Section: Leadership In Partnerships: the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group was dominated by the 'usual suspects' of agencies who had the time and resources to attend meetings (Rowe and Devanney 2003). Bliss (2005) has also warned of partnerships having overly high expectations.…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%