Passenger rail SOEs as domestic institutional market actors

Christensen, Lene Tolstrup

doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2017-0062

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(68 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It refers to the public goods and services produced by the whole society for common consumption and equal enjoyment. Fourth, public service refers to the public goods produced by the government and nongovernmental organizations in the process of handling public business [13].…”

Section: Marketization Of Public Service and Fuzzymentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Aversion of Public Service Marketization Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Feng

2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the development of China’s economy, people’s demand for public services is increasing. While meeting the public better through marketization, it is also easy to lead to some risks. The purpose of this study is to use the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to evaluate the risk of public service marketization and make effective measures to avoid it. This study selects the Public Gymnasiums in different districts of our city as the research object and selects one as the nationalized public service place and the other as the market-oriented public service place. In this study, the amount of service, service equipment, service supervision status, and people’s score under the situation of nationalization and marketization is used as the evaluation indexes of public service marketization. At the same time, combined with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), the risks to the normal operation of the place after marketization are summarized. The results show that the turnover of the nationalized public service places is about 40 million yuan in the past five years, and the capital flow rate gradually decreases from 1.5%; while the market-oriented turnover reaches the maximum of 90 million yuan, the capital flow rate also rises to 2.21%. However, with the marketization, the scores are high and low. This shows that the marketization of public services leads to the improvement of service items and the increase of service charges. The conclusion is that the marketization of public services will have certain risks, but with the control and fine adjustment of enterprises, it is gradually supported by the public.

show abstract

Section: Marketization Of Public Service and Fuzzymentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Aversion of Public Service Marketization Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Feng

2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, two case research papers using interview and archival data sources advanced our knowledge of the changing institutional roles in SOEs' administration and governance mechanisms. The Best Doctoral Thesis Awardee Christensen (2018) presented a longitudinal comparative analysis of Sweden and Denmark Governments' behaviors by investigating "what determines the changing role and behavior of an SOE as a national institutional actor in the marketization of public transportation sector such as passenger railways?". Another paper by Landoni (2018) studied a crucial yet much-underexplored industry in the public management and strategy literature, that is, space.…”

Section: What Have Been Examinedmentioning

confidence: 99%

State-owned enterprises in the contemporary global business scenario: introduction

Xie

Redding

2018

IJPSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the contemporary global business scenario. Against the theoretical background of and the invited themes for the special issue, the paper presents a summary of key findings and practical implications of the accepted papers and suggests future research directions. Design/methodology/approach The paper is conceptual, which organized through utilitarianism or legitimism; SOEs scenario 1 – hungry fox, hunting bears; SOEs scenario 2 – dancing elephant, flying bears; what do we know and what we wish to explore; what have been examined; what we need to study further; closing note by bears’ well-wishers; and protocol of the special issue. Findings By deeply looking into emerging economies (China, India), developed economies (Denmark, Italy, Sweden), transition economies (Tunisia) and diverse sectors (public transport, space), coupled with cross-country sample data, the nine accepted papers have discussed several interesting findings and recommended numerous implications for the policymakers and SOEs’ managers. Drawing upon the interdisciplinary literature, empirical and qualitative papers would deepen the understanding of the growth strategies and performance of SOEs, and the application of management theories such as institutional theory, agency theory, social exchange theory, managerial grid theory, incomplete contracts theory and public governance view, among others. The issue also brings a review-cum-citation analysis paper on the impact of privatization on the performance of SOEs. Originality/value The papers have made unique contributions to the public economics, new public management, international business and organizational development literature by critically analyzing the burgeoning phenomenon of the changing dynamics and globalization of SOEs.

show abstract

Passenger rail SOEs as domestic institutional market actors

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

Risk Aversion of Public Service Marketization Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Risk Aversion of Public Service Marketization Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

State-owned enterprises in the contemporary global business scenario: introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About