2014
DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Hybrid System for Seismic Failure Mode Improvement of a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges in the Transverse Direction

Abstract: This paper presents a numerical study on the seismic damages and failure modes of a trial designed cable-stayed bridge (CSB) with a central span of 1,400 m under earthquake excitations. A passive hybrid control system is proposed to mitigate the seismic damage and improve the failure mode of the CSB; this is composed of a passive control system and several supplemental nonstructural links used as sacrificial energy dissipation devices. The passive control system, including conventional viscous fluid dampers (V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the stiffness of the structure is increased due to the consolidation system, and redundant structural responses will be generated under a large earthquake. In view of this problem, scholars [19,20,21,22] proposed various seismic control schemes on super-long cable-stayed bridges. Infanti et al [23] In this investigation, by conducting experimental performance tests and numerical simulation, the performance of the new damping system and its equivalent design method were verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the stiffness of the structure is increased due to the consolidation system, and redundant structural responses will be generated under a large earthquake. In view of this problem, scholars [19,20,21,22] proposed various seismic control schemes on super-long cable-stayed bridges. Infanti et al [23] In this investigation, by conducting experimental performance tests and numerical simulation, the performance of the new damping system and its equivalent design method were verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining with passive dampers further, hybrid control systems were then proposed for the seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges (Iemura and Pradono, 2002; Jung et al, 2004; Park et al, 2003). Xie and Sun (2014) proposed a passive hybrid control system to suppress the seismic response of a trial designed cable-stayed bridge. The pseudo negative stiffness dampers, which had negative slopes in the hysteretic loops, were also explored to increase the damping level of the components in cable-stayed bridges, such as the stay cables (Shi et al, 2016, 2017a, 2017b; Shi and Zhu, 2015; Zhou and Li, 2016) and the towers (Iemura and Pradono, 2003, 2005, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure mode of the trial designed super long-span CSB without considering pile-soil-structure interaction (abbr. to PSSI) effects was studied under earthquake and the tower shown double plastic hinges in the transverse direction [9]. Although many researches have been conducted on the seismic damages and failure modes of structures including long-span bridges in the longitudinal direction, studies on flexible structures are meager in the transverse direction, particularly for super long-span CSBs considering PSSI effects because such flexible structures can be prone to significant PSSI effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new structural system using sacrificial supporting piers as energy dissipation components to protect towers from seismic damage was proposed by Sun and Xie [20]. The passive hybrid control system comprising the additional energy dissipation links and VFDs was reported in the reference [9], but the study did not consider the influences of the pile-soil interaction on the seismic responses. In addition, basic theoretical and dynamic analyses on soil-foundation have been reported in references [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%