2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the relative velocity vector, Ẍ g is the relative acceleration In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to the research and development of structural control technologies, with particular emphasis on the alleviation of the seismic response of bridges. Thus far, many studies have examined structural control systems to reduce the earthquake-induced damage of CSBs in the longitudinal direction, such as base isolation with isolation bearings (Ali and Abdel-Ghaffar 1994;Li and Yuan 1998;Wesolowsky and Wilson 2003;Soneji and Jangid 2006;Soneji and Jangid 2010), passive control systems with viscous fluid dampers (VFDs) (Ali and Abdel-Ghaffar 1994;Seim 2002;Combault et al 2005;Ye and Fan 2006;Vader and McDaniel 2007), and hybrid control systems with a combination of passive and semiactive systems, passive and active systems, or passive and passive systems (Iemura and Pradono 2002;Bontempi et al 2003;Park et al 2003;Park et al 2003;Soneji and Jangid 2007). These studies have shown that structural control technologies can significantly reduce the seismic damage or response of CSBs, except for isolation technology, which increases the displacement response of the deck.…”
Section: Nonlinear Equation Of Motion and Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the relative velocity vector, Ẍ g is the relative acceleration In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to the research and development of structural control technologies, with particular emphasis on the alleviation of the seismic response of bridges. Thus far, many studies have examined structural control systems to reduce the earthquake-induced damage of CSBs in the longitudinal direction, such as base isolation with isolation bearings (Ali and Abdel-Ghaffar 1994;Li and Yuan 1998;Wesolowsky and Wilson 2003;Soneji and Jangid 2006;Soneji and Jangid 2010), passive control systems with viscous fluid dampers (VFDs) (Ali and Abdel-Ghaffar 1994;Seim 2002;Combault et al 2005;Ye and Fan 2006;Vader and McDaniel 2007), and hybrid control systems with a combination of passive and semiactive systems, passive and active systems, or passive and passive systems (Iemura and Pradono 2002;Bontempi et al 2003;Park et al 2003;Park et al 2003;Soneji and Jangid 2007). These studies have shown that structural control technologies can significantly reduce the seismic damage or response of CSBs, except for isolation technology, which increases the displacement response of the deck.…”
Section: Nonlinear Equation Of Motion and Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first numerical studies on SDS applied to cable-stayed bridges isolated the deck from the supports with LRB, observing that the efficiency of the SDS is reduced by increasing the main span length of the bridge [12]. Soneji and Jangid [14] combined transverse and longitudinal VD units with sliding and elastomeric bearings (including LRB) to isolate the deck in a two-dimensional numerical model of the Quincy Bayview bridge (USA, 274-m main span). Soneji and Jangid [14] combined transverse and longitudinal VD units with sliding and elastomeric bearings (including LRB) to isolate the deck in a two-dimensional numerical model of the Quincy Bayview bridge (USA, 274-m main span).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the damping coefficient comes to a certain range, the corresponding moment at the base of the tower with dampers may even exceed that of moment without damper installed. Soneji and Jangid (2007) found that FVDs can be more effective in controlling the peak isolator displacement of the isolated cable-stayed bridge while simultaneously, limiting the base shear in towers. Jiao et al (2009) studied the effects of different connecting devices, including FVDs, between towers and decks on the seismic responses of a longspan cable-stayed bridge and the results showed that the effect of the damping coefficient on moment of tower bases in the longitudinal direction is not linear, but shows some fluctuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%