2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Transport of Ionic Drugs through Membranes with pH-Dependent Fixed Charges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the wall thickness of the HSA/DMPA microcapsules, that is, the number of HSA/DMPA layers, will also influence the release rate. This can be quantified by calculating the permeability coefficient (P) by using Equation (1), [11] P ¼ ðDc t =DtÞVd Sðc 0 ÀctÞ ð1Þ in which P (cm 2 s À1 ) is the permeability coefficient of the capsule membrane, S is the effective surface area of the dispersed capsules, d (cm) is the thickness of the capsule wall, V is the volume of the bulk solution, Dc t /Dt is the concentration change per unit time, which can be evaluated from the derivative of the fractional release curve, and c t and c 0 are the drug concentrations in the bulk solution and within the capsules, respectively. We assumed that 1) the microcapsules were cubic, with a mean size of 15 15 15 mm 3 , 2) c 0 was equal to the saturation solubility of ibuprofen in the buffer solution, and 3) the average thickness of an HSA/DMPA capsule was 10 nm (as confirmed by the single-particle light scattering experiment [12] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the wall thickness of the HSA/DMPA microcapsules, that is, the number of HSA/DMPA layers, will also influence the release rate. This can be quantified by calculating the permeability coefficient (P) by using Equation (1), [11] P ¼ ðDc t =DtÞVd Sðc 0 ÀctÞ ð1Þ in which P (cm 2 s À1 ) is the permeability coefficient of the capsule membrane, S is the effective surface area of the dispersed capsules, d (cm) is the thickness of the capsule wall, V is the volume of the bulk solution, Dc t /Dt is the concentration change per unit time, which can be evaluated from the derivative of the fractional release curve, and c t and c 0 are the drug concentrations in the bulk solution and within the capsules, respectively. We assumed that 1) the microcapsules were cubic, with a mean size of 15 15 15 mm 3 , 2) c 0 was equal to the saturation solubility of ibuprofen in the buffer solution, and 3) the average thickness of an HSA/DMPA capsule was 10 nm (as confirmed by the single-particle light scattering experiment [12] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein adsorption on membranes not only could change the pore size and charge property of the membrane but also could give valuable information for the study of the protein transport mechanism within the membrane. 6,11,12 There have been, however, few reports on the relationship between insulin adsorption on and transport through a membrane for the drug delivery. It is of great interest to study the insulin adsorption behavior on the charged membranes for the administration of insulin release.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[13][14][15][16] In the present study, a series of amphoteric charged membranes with different ratios of acidic to basic groups were prepared, and the insulin adsorption on the prepared membranes was investigated at different pHs. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the insulin adsorption behavior and the surface charge property of the amphoteric charged membranes for drug delivery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Therefore, there is still a lot of work to do for the quantitative description of the diffusion of insulin through the porous charged membranes.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Experimental And Estimated Pmentioning
confidence: 99%