2021
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.721919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past, Present, and Future of Multisensory Wearable Technology to Monitor Sleep and Circadian Rhythms

Abstract: Movement-based sleep-wake detection devices (i.e., actigraphy devices) were first developed in the early 1970s and have repeatedly been validated against polysomnography, which is considered the “gold-standard” of sleep measurement. Indeed, they have become important tools for objectively inferring sleep in free-living conditions. Standard actigraphy devices are rooted in accelerometry to measure movement and make predictions, via scoring algorithms, as to whether the wearer is in a state of wakefulness or sle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, peripherally scored sleep staging data are still insufficient for replacing sleep stages derived from polysomnography. Regardless, values from at-home sleep tracking devices can be useful, especially as they can be sampled over many days and in large numbers of people, unlike polysomnography 9,11 . For sleep stage classification, the performance of the Happy Generalized model performed about the same as other similar devices on the market both in-lab and at-home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason, peripherally scored sleep staging data are still insufficient for replacing sleep stages derived from polysomnography. Regardless, values from at-home sleep tracking devices can be useful, especially as they can be sampled over many days and in large numbers of people, unlike polysomnography 9,11 . For sleep stage classification, the performance of the Happy Generalized model performed about the same as other similar devices on the market both in-lab and at-home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the concept of evaluating the performance of devices relative to their context has emerged as a strategy for addressing the limitations of more traditional validation approaches 10,36 . With the establishment of these standards, applications of novel sensors and scoring strategies have been called for 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In direct comparison against PSG, multi-sensor wearables using PPG fall short when determining sleep stages or identifying periods of wake during a sleep episode [ 10 , 14 ]. Multi-sensor sleep trackers still represent a step forward, but are not accurate enough to be considered replacements for laboratory measurements [ 10 , 15 ]. This is just one example of how laboratory sensors and consumer wearables may differ with regard to measuring signals of interest.…”
Section: Sensors Vs Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various sleep measurement devices, and methods based on body movements ( 17 ). Two commonly used devices include the smartwatch and smartphone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%