2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06063-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch and curvature specific estimation of efficient sampling scheme for complex surface inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the best-fit alignment, the implant-cranium reconstruction model was positioned relative to the mirrored cranium model ( Figure 11 b). The best-fit alignment of the test and reference surfaces ensures that all components are placed in the same coordinate system [ 39 ]. It suggests that the test surface should overlay its idealized counterpart as close as feasible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the best-fit alignment, the implant-cranium reconstruction model was positioned relative to the mirrored cranium model ( Figure 11 b). The best-fit alignment of the test and reference surfaces ensures that all components are placed in the same coordinate system [ 39 ]. It suggests that the test surface should overlay its idealized counterpart as close as feasible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim [13] et al compared the above four planning methods on a three-coordinate measuring machine, and found that the optimal sampling point planning is related to the priority coefficient and sample size. Syed [14] et al segmented and graded the surface according to the curvature, and respectively used Hammersley, Poisson point distribution method and UDM to plan the sampling points, and found that the UDM has the largest fitting error. The blind sampling method is simple to implement and has good versatility, but because the shape complexity of the surface is not considered, the sampling points cannot be adaptively distributed according to the complexity of the surface, and the sampling points may be redundant [15].…”
Section: A Blind Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry-guided sampling methods usually analyze geometrical features, such as knot vectors, curvature, arclength, and inflection points, and combine multiple factors by conferring different weights. These methods enable the inspection points to reach the characteristic distribution [2,3,[7][8][9][10]. The error-guided sampling methods analyze the machine error, reconstruction error, reconstruction uncertainty, and other errors and utilize the error analysis results to determine critical points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%