2015
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series – analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009–2012

Abstract: Contact allergy to fragrances is common throughout Europe, with regional variation probably being explained by patch test technique, and differences in exposure and referral patterns. The current basic markers of fragrance sensitivity in the baseline series should be supplemented with additional fragrance allergens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
14
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall average prevalence of colophonium sensitization in this time frame was 1.67%. On comparison of our results with those of other European studies, such as the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) results presented by Frosch et al, we confirm a low prevalence of sensitization to this allergen in Italy. In the ESSCA study, colophonium sensitization prevalence showed marked differences between the 12 European countries that participated in the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The overall average prevalence of colophonium sensitization in this time frame was 1.67%. On comparison of our results with those of other European studies, such as the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) results presented by Frosch et al, we confirm a low prevalence of sensitization to this allergen in Italy. In the ESSCA study, colophonium sensitization prevalence showed marked differences between the 12 European countries that participated in the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They differ concerning shape (round or square), material (aluminium or plastics), and the use of filter paper. Investigations have, on the whole, shown good agreement between various systems , but there are differences , which is why the same system, whether it is a preloaded or initially unloaded system, should preferably be used for the same sensitizers when an MPTS is performed. Thus, some sensitizers within an MPTS can be tested with a preloaded system, and other sensitizers can be tested with an unloaded system.…”
Section: Factors Of Significance For the Patch Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the substances considered here, other excipients may act as haptens, namely preservatives and fragrances. Results with these have been published elsewhere (A. Giménez Arnau, in preparation, and Frosch, Johansen and Schuttelaar).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%