1998
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography--value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique.

Abstract: Non-electrocardiographically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography allows reliable assessment of the patency of venous and arterial coronary bypass grafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, both 3D noncontrast 64 and contrast-enhanced coronary MRA have been used for assessment of graft patency, 65,66 with slightly improved results. The accuracy of ECG-gated SSFP sequences appears to be similar to that of spin-echo and gradient-echo approaches.…”
Section: Coronary Mra For Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, both 3D noncontrast 64 and contrast-enhanced coronary MRA have been used for assessment of graft patency, 65,66 with slightly improved results. The accuracy of ECG-gated SSFP sequences appears to be similar to that of spin-echo and gradient-echo approaches.…”
Section: Coronary Mra For Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the patency and stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts can be assessed reliably with conventional X-ray angiography, this technique is invasive and involves some risk. MRI has been shown to be useful for demonstrating the occlusion of coronary artery bypass graft with the use of spin-echo MRI (sensitivity/specificity of 90%/72%) (70), cine MRI (88%/ 100%) (71), and CE 3D MRA (95%/81%) (72). Recently Bunce et al (72) evaluated the accuracy of SSFP multislice MR images and CE 3D MRA for the detection of coronary artery bypass patency in 25 patients.…”
Section: Mr Of Coronary Artery Bypass Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI has been shown to be useful for demonstrating the occlusion of coronary artery bypass graft with the use of spin-echo MRI (sensitivity/specificity of 90%/72%) (70), cine MRI (88%/ 100%) (71), and CE 3D MRA (95%/81%) (72). Recently Bunce et al (72) evaluated the accuracy of SSFP multislice MR images and CE 3D MRA for the detection of coronary artery bypass patency in 25 patients. Although the sensitivity values of steady-state MRA and CE-MRA were similar (84% vs. 85%), SSFP MRI resulted in more false-positive findings for occlusions and reduced visualization of the arterial grafts.…”
Section: Mr Of Coronary Artery Bypass Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, 3-D MR angiography techniques, such as gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence and navigator-gated MR angiography with 1-mm resolution, proved to be feasible in assessing graft patency over a longer course. 7,8,22 The overall sensitivity and specificity of these techniques in detecting patent grafts varied from 88% to 98% and 72% to 100%, respectively. In the present study, we applied a technically improved highresolution MR angiography sequence, which allowed the identification of vein graft occlusion with an at least as good sensitivity (83%) and specificity (98% to 100%) as previously obtained values with lower spatial resolution.…”
Section: Previous Experience In Mr Angiography Of Graftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous 2-dimensional (2-D) spin-echo and gradient-echo MR techniques, 4 -6 3-dimensional (3-D) breath-hold contrastenhanced MR angiography techniques, 7,8 and volume coronary angiography using targeted scans (VCATS) 9 have enabled the evaluation of graft patency and could only differentiate between graft patency and occlusion. The assessment of vein graft disease has remained a problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%