2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2645905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Nevertheless, there are still a large number of SEP and SEP owners making efficient access to the standard by a diverse range of IoT implementers doubtful. 27 The sheer transaction costs of identifying and negotiating licenses with each and every SEP owner may be prohibitively high especially for SMEs, while the complex and non-transparent SEP landscape creates uncertainty over which patents IoT manufacturers precisely use and infringe. The problems with SEPs licensing for connectivity standards are not new, global SEP litigation, competition investigations and policy debates have played out for years in the telecommunications industry.…”
Section:  Iot and Interoperability Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Nevertheless, there are still a large number of SEP and SEP owners making efficient access to the standard by a diverse range of IoT implementers doubtful. 27 The sheer transaction costs of identifying and negotiating licenses with each and every SEP owner may be prohibitively high especially for SMEs, while the complex and non-transparent SEP landscape creates uncertainty over which patents IoT manufacturers precisely use and infringe. The problems with SEPs licensing for connectivity standards are not new, global SEP litigation, competition investigations and policy debates have played out for years in the telecommunications industry.…”
Section:  Iot and Interoperability Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%