2016
DOI: 10.1177/0142331215625770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path following control for a stratospheric airship with actuator saturation

Abstract: This paper proposes two different path following control schemes for a stratospheric airship with actuator saturation. Each of the control schemes consists of a guidance loop and an attitude control loop. In both schemes, guidance laws are designed according to the line-of-sight guidance-based path following principle. In the first control scheme, a robust H∞ controller without constraints is designed based on the planar model of a stratospheric airship to stabilize path-following errors. The input constraints… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…T is the state, X 2 = [ψ, x, y] T is the measured output, and F = [F T , δ r ] T is the control input, where F T denotes the thrust force and δ r denotes the rudder deflection. The specific expressions of the variables above are described in Reference [9].…”
Section: Airship Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T is the state, X 2 = [ψ, x, y] T is the measured output, and F = [F T , δ r ] T is the control input, where F T denotes the thrust force and δ r denotes the rudder deflection. The specific expressions of the variables above are described in Reference [9].…”
Section: Airship Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the inherent dynamics nonlinearity, unknown dynamics, parametric uncertainty, and external disturbance, airship path following control becomes a challenging research topic [ 4 , 5 ]. Numerous achievements on the path following problems have been witnessed, employing various methods such as sliding mode control (SMC) [ 6 , 7 ], H-infinity [ 8 , 9 ], backstepping control [ 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], fuzzy control [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], and so forth. In Reference [ 19 ], a computationally efficient observer-based model predictive control (MPC) method is presented to achieve arbitrary path following for marine vessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. According to equation (25), Calculate the accumulation from i = 1 to i = ∞. Then the following can be obtained…”
Section: B Design Of the Robust Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La relevancia de eliminar el fenómeno de windup mediante un diseño adecuado del controlador es abordada en los trabajos de Ahmed and Iqbal (2017) que diseñan un controlador anti-windup para un actuador con entradas saturadas, obteniendo excelentes resultados en lo que se refiere a rendimiento. Otros casos de controladores "anti-windup" se implementan en aeronáutica como por ejemplo Ping, et al, (2017); Zheng, et al, (2017) ;Liu, et al, (2017b) mientras que en el control de sistemas eléctricos y de potencia se encuentran Oliveira, et al, (2017); Makrygiorgou and Alexandridis (2017). Más casos relacionados al control "anti-windup" se pueden ver en Akram, et al 2017; Liu, et al (2017a); Adegbege and Heath (2017); Singh, et al, (2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified