2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5159998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path following using transverse feedback linearization: Application to a maglev positioning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many magnetic levitation control design have been reported in the literature, including feedback linearization based controllers [4,6,[9][10][11], linear state feedback control design [6,12], the gain scheduling approach [13], observer-based control [5], neural network techniques [14], sliding mode controllers [8,15,16], backstepping control [17], model predictive control [18], cascade control [19] and PID controllers [20]. Since the governing differential equations are highly nonlinear, the nonlinear controllers are more attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many magnetic levitation control design have been reported in the literature, including feedback linearization based controllers [4,6,[9][10][11], linear state feedback control design [6,12], the gain scheduling approach [13], observer-based control [5], neural network techniques [14], sliding mode controllers [8,15,16], backstepping control [17], model predictive control [18], cascade control [19] and PID controllers [20]. Since the governing differential equations are highly nonlinear, the nonlinear controllers are more attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it is desirable that the movement on the target manifold (tangential movement) can be influenced. Secondly, if the system is initialized exactly on the manifold (or more precisely in a corresponding controlled invariant subset of the state space) then it should stay on the manifold for all future times (in the nominal, undisturbed case) independent of the tangential movement [2]. This property is subsequently referred to as the invariance property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when starting on the path (or in a corresponding controlled invariant subset of the state space) the system stays exactly on the path for all future times [1]. Note that trajectory tracking control does not necessarily share this property [2]. The paths are typically defined in the state space [5], [6] or output space [2], [7] of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [12] Aguiar et al have used adaptive switched supervisory control combined with a non linear Lyapunov-based control to ensure the global convergence of the position tracking error to a small neighborhood of the origin, without assuring the convergence to zero. In spite of the inconvenience of convergence to a neighborhood, this work has been used as a base for many recent path following applications, such as [13], [14] and [15]. Lini et al [11] have provided theoretical results to show the connection between the geometric continuity of the trajectory and smoothness of control inputs under velocity, acceleration and jerk constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%