The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/eucap.2014.6902576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path loss model comparison for LTE-Advanced relay backhaul link in urban environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario is used to quantify the impact of the relay antenna or the relaying protocol. PL is calculated with models described in [29][30][31][32] and summarized by (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Since RS and MS are always under the rooftops in an urban environment, the optical visibility between BS and RS or between BS and MS is unlikely.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scenario is used to quantify the impact of the relay antenna or the relaying protocol. PL is calculated with models described in [29][30][31][32] and summarized by (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Since RS and MS are always under the rooftops in an urban environment, the optical visibility between BS and RS or between BS and MS is unlikely.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper aims to compare the relay-assisted communication throughput with the throughput provided by the direct link. Path loss models or measured values used for the analysis are extracted from a measurement campaign that was described in [29][30][31][32]. Reference [29] is focused on the backhaul link whereas [30][31][32] are focused on the access link.…”
Section: A Basic Relay Network Is Composed Of a Base Station (Bs) Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WINNER II Type 5a and Type 5f path loss models are considered for the backhaul LOS and NLOS links, respectively. In addition, the WINNER II Type C2 model is utilized for calculating the path loss of the access links for both macro and small cell [22,23] as follows: For modeling of the large-scale shadow fading, a lognormal random variable is used, with zero mean and standard deviations for the access links and the backhaul links of 10 dB and 4 dB, respectively. The temporal correlation of the shadowing is taken into account with a decorrelation distance of 25 m.…”
Section: B Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backhaul link between the BS and RN is assumed to be reliable and in line of sight (LOS), while the access links between the BS and UE and between RN and UE are in non LOS (NLOS). The WINNER II (Type C2) path loss model is considered for both macro and small cell [28,29] as follows: Large-scale shadow fading is modelled as a lognormal random variable with zero mean and standard deviations of 10 dB for the access links and 4 dB for the backhaul links. The temporal correlation of the shadowing is modeled with a decorrelation distance of 25 m.…”
Section: B Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%