2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogen and Particle Associations in Wastewater

Abstract: Disinfection guidelines exist for pathogen inactivation in potable water and recycled water, but wastewater with high numbers of particles can be more difficult to disinfect, making compliance with the guidelines problematic. Disinfection guidelines specify that drinking water with turbidity ≥1 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) is not suitable for disinfection and therefore not fit for purpose. Treated wastewater typically has higher concentrations of particles (1-10NTU for secondary treated effluent). Two p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
(251 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More sensitive methods, but also improved interpretation of wastewater surveillance data, would be facilitated by a better understanding of the state of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and surrogate nucleic acids within wastewater and, specifically, what proportion are a) contained within viral particles, b) released and dissolved, or c) released and bound to other particles. While some studies have explored viral associations to various wastewater particles in terms of size and charge ( da Silva et al., 2008 ; Hejkal et al., 1981 ), variability in particle association between different types of viruses ( Chahal et al., 2016 , Chen et al., 2020 , Colosi et al., 2020 , Crits-Christoph et al., 2021 , da Silva et al., 2008 ) suggests that both SARS-CoV-2 and surrogate viral particle associations may require specific study with an additional focus on the state(s) of nucleic acids. If some DNA or RNA is bound, knowing the size and mass of the particles and how they vary over time and across locations would greatly improve the precision of methods based on size (e.g., ultrafiltration), charge (e.g., electropositive filtration), or mass (e.g., ultracentrifugation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sensitive methods, but also improved interpretation of wastewater surveillance data, would be facilitated by a better understanding of the state of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and surrogate nucleic acids within wastewater and, specifically, what proportion are a) contained within viral particles, b) released and dissolved, or c) released and bound to other particles. While some studies have explored viral associations to various wastewater particles in terms of size and charge ( da Silva et al., 2008 ; Hejkal et al., 1981 ), variability in particle association between different types of viruses ( Chahal et al., 2016 , Chen et al., 2020 , Colosi et al., 2020 , Crits-Christoph et al., 2021 , da Silva et al., 2008 ) suggests that both SARS-CoV-2 and surrogate viral particle associations may require specific study with an additional focus on the state(s) of nucleic acids. If some DNA or RNA is bound, knowing the size and mass of the particles and how they vary over time and across locations would greatly improve the precision of methods based on size (e.g., ultrafiltration), charge (e.g., electropositive filtration), or mass (e.g., ultracentrifugation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected concentrations of F-specific RNA bacteriophages in raw wastewater has been reported to range approximately from 10 4 to 10 6 PFU/100 mL (De Luca et al., 2013; McMinn et al., 2017; Thwaites et al., 2018; Zhang and Farahbakhsh, 2007). The concentration of faecal coliforms ( E. coli , TtC and Enterococcus ) in raw wastewater ranges from 10 6 to 10 7 CFU/100 mL (Henze et al., 2008); Chahal et al. (2016) reported for E. coli concentrations of 10 4 to 10 9 CFU/100 mL, and Matthews et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017) reported removal efficiencies of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) such as F-specific RNA bacteriophages and total coliforms of 99.5% and higher. FIOs may be either physically removed, being enmeshed into the flocs during the sedimentation process (Chahal et al., 2016; Fauvel et al., 2017; Guzman et al., 2007), or biologically predated by other high order organisms such as protozoa (Mallory et al., 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing drought and human population, a number of regions are now beginning to employ wastewater recycling as a key component of municipal drinking water. Aside from being used for non-potable uses such as crop and parkland irrigation, some recycled water is being used for potable water [ 119 ]. As well, UV light is used in many broad-distribution and also point of use water systems [ 120 ].…”
Section: Biofilm Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%