2008
DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e3282f2dfb8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenesis and treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections

Abstract: Improved understanding of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli pathophysiology and progression to hemolytic uremic syndrome provides the basis for prevention, prophylactic and treatment strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
102
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Examination of the frequency distribution of the survival in the (C3  B6)F2 mice reveals that the phenotype is not normally distributed and presents a major spike in the distribution at day 30 (censored data, shown with crosshatched pattern). Also, when considering only nonsurviving mice (noncensored data), the phenotype is not normally distributed as there is a sharp increase in mortality early in infection (days [10][11][12][13][14] and then a gradual decrease in mortality up to days 24-27, leading to a distribution with a long 'tail' toward the right-hand side of the graph. (d) Examination of the frequency distribution of the survival in the (C3Ou  B6)F2 mice reveals an even larger spike in the distribution at day 30 (censored data).…”
Section: Segregation Of Survival Phenotype In F2 Crossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(c) Examination of the frequency distribution of the survival in the (C3  B6)F2 mice reveals that the phenotype is not normally distributed and presents a major spike in the distribution at day 30 (censored data, shown with crosshatched pattern). Also, when considering only nonsurviving mice (noncensored data), the phenotype is not normally distributed as there is a sharp increase in mortality early in infection (days [10][11][12][13][14] and then a gradual decrease in mortality up to days 24-27, leading to a distribution with a long 'tail' toward the right-hand side of the graph. (d) Examination of the frequency distribution of the survival in the (C3Ou  B6)F2 mice reveals an even larger spike in the distribution at day 30 (censored data).…”
Section: Segregation Of Survival Phenotype In F2 Crossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival time distribution for C3OuB6F2 mice reveals an even larger spike of surviving mice at day 30 ( Figure 2d). When considering only nonsurviving mice (noncensored data), the phenotype is not normally distributed either: there is a sharp increase in mortality early in infection (days [10][11][12][13][14] and then a gradual decrease in mortality up to days 24-27, leading to a distribution with a long 'tail' toward the right-hand side of the graph. This is seen in both crosses, although it is more evident in the C3 cross (Figures 2c and d).…”
Section: Segregation Of Survival Phenotype In F2 Crossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This foodborne enteric pathogen is acquired from contaminated foodstuffs and non-chlorinated drinking water (Karch et al, 2005;Maki, 2006;Rangel et al, 2005). In the severest cases of infection (~10-15 % of cases), the haemolytic uraemic syndrome develops as a systemic complication, leading to patient hospitalization, kidney failure and death (Serna & Boedeker, 2008;Tarr et al, 2005). Renal disease results from bacterial cytotoxin [Shiga-like toxin (Stx)-1 and -2] production in the gut, release into the systemic circulation and damage to vascular endothelial cells in the renal glomerulus (Blackall & Marques, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outbreaks of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) serotype O157 : H7 infection occur frequently across the developed world (Serna & Boedeker, 2008). This foodborne enteric pathogen is acquired from contaminated foodstuffs and non-chlorinated drinking water (Karch et al, 2005;Maki, 2006;Rangel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%