The capacity of 16S internal transcribed spacer (16S-ITS) rRNA gene RFLP to differentiate 16 type strains and nine clinical isolates of staphylococci was evaluated. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified together with the ITS region and the amplification products were digested with TaqI restriction enzyme. Analysis of the 16S-ITS rRNA gene RFLP profiles differentiated each of the 16 type strains into distinct RFLP haplotypes.
INTRODUCTIONThe habitat of staphylococci is skin, skin glands and mucous membranes of humans and many animals. The genus Staphylococcus includes both pathogenic and saprophytic strains that have been isolated from animal products such as meat and milk, and from environmental sources such as soil, sea water, fresh water, dust and air samples (Kloos et al., 1991).Coagulase-positive species such as Staphylococcus aureus are the cause of many types of infection (Forbes et al., 1998). During the last two decades, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) have also emerged as pathogens causing medical-device-related infections (von Eiff et al., 2002). Because of the pathogenic potential of these bacteria, effective methods are required for their in vitro identification. Beside fatty acid analyses, many diagnostic tests rely on a miniaturized phenotypic characterization and a set of biochemical reactions. These methods enable the identification of S. aureus isolates, but often fail in the identification of CNS (Stoakes et al., 1994;Renneberg et al., 1995;Martineau et al., 1996). Analysis of specific regions of genomic DNA, on the other hand, has produced much more discriminative data. For example, several genomic targets have been effectively used for the identification of Staphylococcus species, including the 16S rRNA gene (Bialkowska-Hobrzanska et al., 1990;De Buyser et al., 1992), the tRNA gene intergenic spacer (Maes et al., 1997), the internal transcribed spacer (Couto et al., 2001), the heat-shock protein 60 (HSP60) gene (Goh et al., 1996), the chaperonin 60 gene (Goh et al., 1997), the femA gene (Vannuffel et al., 1999), the sodA gene (Poyart et al., 2001), the gap gene (Yugueros et al., 2000) and the nuc gene (Brakstad et al., 1992). Recently, an enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR and BOX-PCR were also used in the identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains (Wieser & Busse, 2000). . The nine clinical isolates were S. capitis subsp. capitis (n ¼ 2), S. caprae (n ¼ 2), S. cohnii subsp. cohnii (n ¼ 1) and S. epidermidis (n ¼ 4). The clinical isolates were identified by basic phenotypic tests and the Staph ID 32 system (bioMérieux). All strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Merck) at 37 8C and stored in 25 % (v/v) glycerol at À80 8C.16S-ITS rRNA gene PCR. Genomic DNA was isolated as described by Arciola et al. (2001). Briefly, 100 ìl of overnight culture prepared in 5 ml TSB at 37 8C with shaking was pelleted by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in 45 ìl deionized water and 5 ìl lysostaphin solution (100 ìg ml À1 in dH 2 O; Sigma) and incubated for 10 min...