2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03902-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paths and timings of the peopling of Polynesia inferred from genomic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ho‘oumi results, along with the forgoing archaeological chronologies from the northern Marquesas Islands, point to a longer occupation sequence relative to that recently proposed by Ioannidis and colleagues [ 108 ]. Drawing on genome-wide data and novel computational analyses, they suggest divergence (and by extension settlement) dates for the northern Marquesas of around AD 1330–1360.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Ho‘oumi results, along with the forgoing archaeological chronologies from the northern Marquesas Islands, point to a longer occupation sequence relative to that recently proposed by Ioannidis and colleagues [ 108 ]. Drawing on genome-wide data and novel computational analyses, they suggest divergence (and by extension settlement) dates for the northern Marquesas of around AD 1330–1360.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…AD , 95.4% HPD). These new 14 C results indicate human colonisation of Nuku Hiva was roughly two centuries earlier than recent genetic estimates [ 108 ], within a few decades of the Society Islands [ 105 ] if not contemporaneous, but after initial Polynesian explorations in the southern Cook Islands [ 106 , 107 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2000 km from Pitcairn, the nearest inhabited island (Figure 1). The island was initially settled by Polynesian voyagers as part of the large-scale human expansion into East Polynesia in the 12th-13th century AD, after which point current evidence indicates the island was completely isolated [19][20][21][22][23][24]. The island is famous for its impressive megalithic constructions, for the human impacts on its environment, and, controversially, as the location of a demographic and cultural collapse stemming from the unsustainable use of resources [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these results demonstrate the importance of comparing unsuccessful with successful migrations in efforts understand the engines of human dispersal and suggest that the primary obstacles to human migrations and successful range expansion are sociocultural rather than ecological.Research seeking to understand how the environment affects human migration has been focused almost exclusively on successful migrations. In human genetics, for example, an ever increasing number of studies have used the distribution of both modern and ancient DNA samples [2][3][4] to infer migration routes of early humans. At the same time, cultural studies have focused on understanding dispersal routes using archaeological sites [5], cultural phylogenies [6] and language data-e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%