2011
DOI: 10.1057/jdg.2011.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways to leadership: Board independence, diversity and the emerging pipeline in the United States for women directors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reasons differ, supply-side theories all suggest that gender segregation will already be evident in the pipeline of people seeking different jobs (Fernandez and Friedrich 2011;Schweitzer et al 2011;Barbulescu and Bidwell 2013). This "limited pipeline" argument has also been used to explain the paucity of women in top positions (Colaco et al 2011;Barsh et al 2012;Parrotta and Smith 2013) and has been reflected in the popular discourse by which women are encouraged to put themselves forward more aggressively and actively compete for senior roles (e.g. Sandberg 2013).…”
Section: Gender Inequality In the Executive Labor Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the reasons differ, supply-side theories all suggest that gender segregation will already be evident in the pipeline of people seeking different jobs (Fernandez and Friedrich 2011;Schweitzer et al 2011;Barbulescu and Bidwell 2013). This "limited pipeline" argument has also been used to explain the paucity of women in top positions (Colaco et al 2011;Barsh et al 2012;Parrotta and Smith 2013) and has been reflected in the popular discourse by which women are encouraged to put themselves forward more aggressively and actively compete for senior roles (e.g. Sandberg 2013).…”
Section: Gender Inequality In the Executive Labor Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research argues for the importance of supply-side factors, claiming that the paucity of women in top positions reflects, at least in part, the limited pipeline of experienced female candidates available to fill senior executive roles (Colaco et al 2011;Barsh et al 2012;Parrotta and Smith 2013). In contrast, other work focuses on organizational demand-side barriers that prevent women's advancement to higher-level corporate positions-whether through internal (DiPrete and Soule 1988;Cohen et al 1998;Barnett et al 2000;Yap and Konrad 2009; or external labor market transitions (Brett and Stroh 1997;Lyness and Judiesch 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os dois pisos, divididos por um teto de vidro, permitem às mulheres percecionarem os cargos disponíveis, mas não sendo estes atingíveis pelas mesmas. Para Kirchmeyer (2002) A literatura existente demonstra, portanto, que as mulheres têm menor representatividade do que os homens em cargos de gestão de topo (Kirchmeyer, 2002;Adams & Flynn, 2005;Colaco et al, 2010) e também que existe uma segregação de género, em cargos de gestão de topo, por setor de atividade (Riach & Rich, 2002;Pichler et al, 2008;Bertrand & Hallock, 2010;Duarte et al, 2010a). Assim, para além deste estudo testar a representatividade feminina, ir-se-á, também, testar se o género de encontra uniformemente distribuído pelos diferentes setores de atividade, nos cargos de gestão de topo, colocando as seguintes hipóteses:…”
Section: Efeito Glass Ceilingunclassified
“…A escolha do ano de 2007 justifica-se por ter sido o ano imediatamente anterior ao ano de partida para uma crise que começou nos Estados Unidos da América e rapidamente se alastrou a todo mundo (Colaco et al, 2010).…”
Section: Objetivo Do Estudounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation