2013
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2013.867462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Attachment to Therapist Rating Scale: Development and psychometric properties

Abstract: The Patient Attachment to Therapist Rating Scale is a promising approach for assessing the quality of attachment to therapist from patient narratives. Future development should focus on improving the discrimination of the insecure subscales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The CATS is not the only self-report measure of client attachment to their therapist (cf., Parish & Eagle, 2003), but it is the only one that has apparently been studied so far in connection with therapy outcome. (Note that observer-rated scales are also in development, Lilliengren et al, 2014). The five studies that provided data are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Sources Of Data and Research Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CATS is not the only self-report measure of client attachment to their therapist (cf., Parish & Eagle, 2003), but it is the only one that has apparently been studied so far in connection with therapy outcome. (Note that observer-rated scales are also in development, Lilliengren et al, 2014). The five studies that provided data are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Sources Of Data and Research Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial study of the psychometric properties of the PAT-RS (based on the same materials as in the present study) indicated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's a > .90 across three raters) as well as close to excellent interrater reliability (ICC [2, 1] = .74; Cicchetti, 1994;Shrout & Fleiss, 1979) for this subscale (Lilliengren et al, 2014). Construct validity was also indicated by moderate correlations in the expected directions with measures of the alliance (the Helping Alliance Questionnaire [HAq-II]; Luborsky et al, 1996), developmental levels of internal representations (Differentiation Relatedness Scale [DRS]; Blatt & Auerbach, 2001), self-concept (Structural Analysis of Social Be haviour [SASB]; Benjamin, 2000), symptom severity (the Global Severity Index [GSI]; Derogatis, 1994), and global functioning (the Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]; American Psychi atric Association, 2000).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Contemporary psychotherapy research has emphasized the examination of the relational aspects of the alliance; thus, it has been an important variable in the understanding of psychotherapy process. Aspects such as patient characteristics and therapist activity have been the focus of empirical research studying the relationship between the alliance and therapy outcome (Blatt, Sanislow, Zuroff, & Pilkonis, ; Falkenström, Granström, & Holmqvist, ; Lilliengren, Falkenström, Sandell, Risholm Mothander, & Werbart, ; Lilliengren & Werbart, ; Lilliengren et al., ).…”
Section: The Infant Studymentioning
confidence: 99%