Patient cues and medical interviewing in general practice: examples of the application of sequential analysis

Abstract

SUMMARYAims – To illustrate how sequence analysis may be applied to the medical interview to: 1. explore how physicians without formal training in communication skills elicit and respond to patient cues and expression of expectations and opinions; and 2. test the hypothesis that physicians' closed ended questions determine the use of subsequent closed ended questions. Methods – 238 consultations in primary care, coded with the Verona Medical Interview Classification System, were analysed. Lag 1 analysis was applied to study which physician behaviour precedes and follows patient cues. Pattern recognition analysis for five lag sequences was performed to test the occurrence of predefined specific code chains, where a closed and an open ended question were followed either by two closed-ended questions or by two patient facilitating interventions Results – Patients' cue offers were most likely after facilitative interventions, but not after open-ended questions; physicians were most likely to respond to these expressions with facilitation. Physicians' tendency to use closed ended questions increased after previous closed questions and decreased after an open-ended question. Conclusions – Lag sequential analysis and pattern recognition analysis are useful methods to study exploratory and theory driven hypotheses and allow an initial approach to validate the supposed appropriateness of specific physician interventions.Declaration of Interest: none.

How Do Medical Students Respond to Emotional Cues and Concerns Expressed by Simulated Patients during OSCE Consultations? – A Multilevel Study

“…To date the majority of studies investigating the relationship between patient cue expression and provider response have adopted a ‘lag 1 sequential analysis’ approach [13,15,16]. While it is important to understand communication influences between adjacent utterances, the limitation of this approach is that the longer-term speech influences remained unexplored.…”

Improving doctor-patient communication: content validity examination of a novel urinary system-simulating physical model

“…Research focusing on the concerns of clinical physicians has been extensive. Studies have found that attentive and respectful listening in communication reinforced the healing process and positively affected patient satisfaction;21–23 theater training was effective at teaching clinical empathy;24 empathic responses during doctor–patient information exchanges were consistently associated with positive patient outcome, stable patient adherence, and symptom resolution;25–30 a physician’s attention to a computer monitor diminished dialogue between the physician and the patient and was inversely correlated with the effect of communication;31 and audiovisual aids, such as figures, pictures, DVDs, and MP3 files, were helpful for transferring medical information, promoting doctor–patient communication, and improving patient comprehension, recall, and adherence 32–35. To our knowledge, there have been few or no studies with regard to the effectiveness of a simulator or anatomic model in promoting doctor–patient communication and improving patient outcomes.…”

Five years of EACH (European Association for Communication in Healthcare)

“…Given the topics of EACH committee members' most recent publications, new areas of interest include, for instance, the role of the broader context in which a problem is presented [11], unconventional outcome measures such as skin conductance and cortisol [12] and new interaction analysis systems, such as sequence analysis and cue-responding [13][14][15][16][17][18]. There also appears to be an increasing interest in the role of the nurse-patient communication [19,20] and role delineation [21,22] as well as a renewed interest in decision-making [23], breaking bad news [24,25], training effects [26][27][28] and somatization [29,30].…”