2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Discomfort during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Comparison Study between Iodixanol versus Iopamidol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, in this study, QRHZD was used as the carrier of bitterness to evaluate the taste-masking e ect, characteristic chromatography analysis, and pharmacological e ects of three avors of CMD-Ms after optimization. Currently, the commonly used taste evaluation methods for volunteers in the world include the "single sample comparative evaluation method" [24], "bitterness value grade evaluation method" [25], "integrated score evaluation method(ISEM)" [26], "fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation method" [27], "visual analog scale method" [28], "multifactor survey evaluation method" [29], "measurement matching + amplitude marking evaluation method" [30], and "taste magnetic resonance imaging evaluation method" [31]. Each method has its own unique advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, in this study, QRHZD was used as the carrier of bitterness to evaluate the taste-masking e ect, characteristic chromatography analysis, and pharmacological e ects of three avors of CMD-Ms after optimization. Currently, the commonly used taste evaluation methods for volunteers in the world include the "single sample comparative evaluation method" [24], "bitterness value grade evaluation method" [25], "integrated score evaluation method(ISEM)" [26], "fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation method" [27], "visual analog scale method" [28], "multifactor survey evaluation method" [29], "measurement matching + amplitude marking evaluation method" [30], and "taste magnetic resonance imaging evaluation method" [31]. Each method has its own unique advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we demonstrate that contrast type may have important implications in peripheral interventions. IOCM is often preferred for peripheral angiography 28 as it causes less patient discomfort as compared with LOCM, especially in patients with CLI 29,30 . Decreasing patient discomfort 21 may facilitate more optimal revascularization with higher likelihood of limb salvage, due to less patient movement resulting in better image quality 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 mL of the solution was placed in the mouths of the volunteers for 15 s. They also gargled to allow the tongue to fully feel the bitterness. Then, the volunteers gave a score based on a visual analogue scale. The bitter sensory score scale for the volunteers is shown in Figure A. The next sample needed to be tested more than 15 min apart later so that there was no bitterness in the mouth.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%