2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x18000284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient experience of supported computerized CBT in an inner-city IAPT service: a qualitative study

Abstract: Computerized cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) has been developed to address economic and clinical issues around limited access to evidence-based therapy. Supported cCBT (variously termed iCBT or eCBT) has been developed to address issues with the effectiveness of, and engagement with, cCBT. There has been no in-depth qualitative exploration of the patient experience of eCBT within the UK, which might aid improving its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to explore patient experience of eCBT in one inn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have examined the question of online therapeutic alliances using standardized measures such as the Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath and Greenberg, 1989), along with qualitative studies of therapist emails, or interviews with clients. These studies have shown that clients can and do report strong working alliances with their therapist (Andersson et al, 2012b;Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2017;Kiluk et al, 2014;Knaevelsrud and Maercker, 2007;Perera-Delcourt and Sharkey, 2019;Schneider et al, 2016), and that these are in line with the strength of those reported for face-to-face interventions (Andersson et al, 2012b; Knaevelsrud and Maercker, 2007). Providing questionnaire feedback (i.e.…”
Section: Commonly Held Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Studies have examined the question of online therapeutic alliances using standardized measures such as the Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath and Greenberg, 1989), along with qualitative studies of therapist emails, or interviews with clients. These studies have shown that clients can and do report strong working alliances with their therapist (Andersson et al, 2012b;Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2017;Kiluk et al, 2014;Knaevelsrud and Maercker, 2007;Perera-Delcourt and Sharkey, 2019;Schneider et al, 2016), and that these are in line with the strength of those reported for face-to-face interventions (Andersson et al, 2012b; Knaevelsrud and Maercker, 2007). Providing questionnaire feedback (i.e.…”
Section: Commonly Held Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Helpful aspects of online interventions reported by clients include the provision of information, learning therapeutic skills and techniques, autonomy and flexibility, and therapist support [7,16,21,46,51,61]. These features lead to experiences of feeling supported, validated, reassured, relieved and empowered, and more pragmatic experiences of gaining self-awareness and insight, behavioural change and crucially, seeing an improvement in mood or a reduction in symptoms [7,16,36,46,51]. The convenience, accessibility and flexibility of online treatment is particularly significant when compared with traditional face-to-face therapies, which consist of structured, time-bound appointments [49].…”
Section: Experience Of Online Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unhelpful aspects of treatment identified in the literature include program content that is not tailored to individual needs, technical accessibility or usability issues, privacy concerns, the amount of work involved and inadequate support or generic therapist feedback [7,16,46,51,54,76]. These factors lead to experiences of frustration, irritation, isolation, confusion, feeling under pressure, self-criticism and increased anxiety or low mood.…”
Section: Experience Of Online Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations