Patient Experiences with Involuntary Out‐of‐Network Charges

Abstract

Background. Approximately 40 percent of individuals using out-of-network physicians experience involuntary out-of-network care, leading to unexpected and sometimes burdensome financial charges. Despite its prevalence, research on patient experiences with involuntary out-of-network care is limited. Greater understanding of patient experiences may inform policy solutions to address this issue. Objective. To characterize the experiences of patients who encountered involuntary out-of-network physician charges. Methods. Qualitative study using 26 in-depth telephone interviews with a semi-structured interview guide. Participants were a purposeful sample of privately insured adults from across the United States who experienced involuntary out-of-network care. They were diverse with regard to income level, education, and health status. Recurrent themes were generated using the constant comparison method of data analysis by a multidisciplinary team. Results. Four themes characterize the perspective of individuals who experienced involuntary out-of-network physician charges: (1) responsibilities and mechanisms for determining network participation are not transparent; (2) physician procedures for billing and disclosure of physician out-of-network status are inconsistent; (3) serious illness requiring emergency care or hospitalization precludes ability to choose a physician or confirm network participation; and (4) resources for mediation of involuntary charges once they occur are not available. Conclusions. Our data reveal that patient education may not be sufficient to reduce the prevalence and financial burden of involuntary out-of-network care. Participants described experiencing involuntary out-of-network health care charges due to systemlevel failures. As policy makers seek solutions, our findings suggest several potential areas of further consideration such as standardization of processes to disclose that a physician is out-of-network, holding patients harmless not only for out-of-network emergency room care but also for non-elective hospitalization, and designation of a mediator for involuntary charges.

Help-Seeking Behavior and Health Care Navigation by Bhutanese Refugees

“…Individuals seeking specialty care often need referrals and insurance prior authorizations, and they may subsequently need to address medical billing errors. These tasks are rarely trivial for U.S. citizens [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. They may be all but insurmountable for immigrants with limited literacy, English proficiency, or prior experience with comparable health systems.…”

Out‐of‐Network Emergency Department Use among Managed Medicaid Beneficiaries

“…To this point, SFGH has since begun to use process improvement tools to improve patient flow and experience. It may also require significant efforts on the part of health plans to educate members about which facilities are within their contracted network of care (Kyanko et al 2013). Most important, ACOs will need to invest in alternatives to the ED such as same-day primary care visits, urgent care centers, and nurse advice lines.…”

Pediatric and Adult Physician Networks in Affordable Care Act Marketplace Plans

“…24 Concerns were also raised that insurers could intentionally exclude certain providers to make plans disproportionately attractive to healthy patients, and patients might not even be aware that they are using out-of-network physicians. 4,25 The definition and measures of narrow network and the impact of narrow networks on patient care are open to debate, but patients and families who have no in-network specialist options could suffer from poor access. This scenario was common in our study; up to threequarters of pediatric specialist networks and one-third of adult specialist networks lacked specialists.…”