1969
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(69)90243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part I. Design of a study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
13

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…No differences in outcomes were found in either of these studies, both of which were wellconducted randomised controlled trial. 8,32 The earlier study undertaken by Hickey in 1969 has the benefit of a series of follow-up studies which supported the initial findings. It is worth noting that the dentures in these studies were constructed by or under the close supervision of experienced prosthodontists.…”
Section: Methods Of Constructionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…No differences in outcomes were found in either of these studies, both of which were wellconducted randomised controlled trial. 8,32 The earlier study undertaken by Hickey in 1969 has the benefit of a series of follow-up studies which supported the initial findings. It is worth noting that the dentures in these studies were constructed by or under the close supervision of experienced prosthodontists.…”
Section: Methods Of Constructionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A classical longitudinal series of randomised clinical trials initiated in 1969 investigated if clinical differences exist in dentures made using two different techniques . The sample was composed by 64 edentulous patients divided into two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of complete dentures was not reported to suffer when manufacturing techniques were simplified to save time and materials. A well‐designed and well‐conducted series of studies showed no significant difference in outcome between dentures constructed by the two techniques, with or without use of face‐bow, either in the short term or in the long term, when evaluated by both professionals and patients (22–24). The use of proper methods other than the face‐bow record, such as the impression procedure that permits a more accurate and more applicable procedure or creating a good relationship between dentists and patients, are thought to be more appropriate for a successful outcome of a complete denture treatment (25, 26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%