2019
DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13418-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient self-inflicted lung injury: implications for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS patients on non-invasive support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
162
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
4
162
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account both the effects of excessive ventilatory assistance on the risk of diaphragm dysfunction and the effects of insufficient ventilatory assistance on the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury (40), the main objective of diaphragm function monitoring would be to closely tailor the appropriate level of assistance to the patient's needs and comfort. Some strategies designed to protect the lungs and mitigate the effects of diaphragm disuse have been proposed, but they now need to be tested before they can be generalized (41).…”
Section: What Are the Indications For Diaphragm Function Monitoring?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account both the effects of excessive ventilatory assistance on the risk of diaphragm dysfunction and the effects of insufficient ventilatory assistance on the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury (40), the main objective of diaphragm function monitoring would be to closely tailor the appropriate level of assistance to the patient's needs and comfort. Some strategies designed to protect the lungs and mitigate the effects of diaphragm disuse have been proposed, but they now need to be tested before they can be generalized (41).…”
Section: What Are the Indications For Diaphragm Function Monitoring?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study started to raise concerns for potential harmful effects associated with FM-NIV, which were further supported by two large observational studies [18,19]. Potential mechanisms of harm attributable to FM-NIV as compared to HFNC include the poor tolerance of the face-mask interface, increased risk of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and the inability to limit tidal volumes leading to high transpulmonary pressures and ventilator-and patient-inflicted lung injury [20][21][22]. As a result, recent guidelines have expressed uncertainty regarding the use of FM-NIV for the treatment of de novo AHRF [7].…”
Section: (Continued From Previous Page)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The helmet interface may act to decrease air leaks when compared to the face mask interface. This may permit more effective delivery of higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure potentially increasing alveolar recruitment and decreasing respiratory drive [2,8,22,27]. Furthermore, patients with AHRF seem to have better tolerance for a helmet interface minimizing the time that the therapy requires interruption-something not uncommon for FM-NIV [25].…”
Section: (Continued From Previous Page)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta condição está associada à piora da evolução ventilatória e desenvolvimento de quadros de SDRA. 13 P-SILI resulta de esforços inspiratórios intensos e sustentados que levam a variações na pressão transpulmonar (lung stress), causando insuflação de grandes volumes de ar em um pulmão já inflamado, do aumento da pressão transvascular, favorecendo o desenvolvimento de edema pulmonar de pressão negativa e lesão diafragmática por fadiga. P-SILI é mais provável de acontecer em pacientes que se apresentem com insuficiência respiratória hipoxêmica moderada a grave (relação PO 2 /FiO 2 < 200).…”
Section: Critérios Para Admissão Em Utiunclassified