1997
DOI: 10.1136/emj.14.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients telephoning A&E for advice: a comparison of expectations and outcomes.

Abstract: Objective-To investigate the expectations of patients when they phone the accident and emergency (A&E) department, how this relates to the advice they receive, the action they subsequently take, and their satisfaction with the service. Setting-The study was undertaken at an inner city hospital in south east London. Methods-597 calls to the department were documented during the study period, and callers for whom a phone number had been recorded were followed up by structured interviews carried out by a trained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also the very real possibility that their interpretation of the advice may be different from the nurses' perception of what was said. 9 The group of callers who were given other advice and attended the A&E department is considerably smaller than found in another study, 2.4% compared with 41%. 10 However, more than would be anticipated, of this group, were advised to contact their GP 16 and they took longer to attend A&E than patients triaged to A&E. This could indicate that they tried to take other action, either self care or seeing their GP and attended A&E after failure of this action, deterioration in condition, or onward referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also the very real possibility that their interpretation of the advice may be different from the nurses' perception of what was said. 9 The group of callers who were given other advice and attended the A&E department is considerably smaller than found in another study, 2.4% compared with 41%. 10 However, more than would be anticipated, of this group, were advised to contact their GP 16 and they took longer to attend A&E than patients triaged to A&E. This could indicate that they tried to take other action, either self care or seeing their GP and attended A&E after failure of this action, deterioration in condition, or onward referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…[8][9][10] However, objective measures of callers' compliance with telephone advice are more varied, 10-12 although measuring patients' compliance with advice has been shown not to be a straightforward comparison of what professionals record as the advice given and what callers' report as their actions. 9 The aim of the study was to collect objective data about callers' compliance with NHS Direct advice to attend A&E. We also sought to identify the proportion of callers who were given other advice and went to A&E with the same presenting complaint. Furthermore, did callers' characteristics, such as age, distance to nearest A&E, relationship of caller to patient, and call factors, such as time of call, influence callers following the advice?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to the studies from Dale et al, and Leclerc et al [17,19]. One way to ensure that the information is understood is to ask the caller to repeat the advices given by the nurse at the end of the telephone call, but this intervention has received little attention in studies in which nurse advice has been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are numerous research articles that indicate a discrepancy between the advice given over the phone and the subsequent patient action (Crouch, Wood eld, Dale, & Patel, 1997;Dale, Crouch, Patel, & Williams, 1996). This discrepancy may occur because the client did not correctly understand the advice being given.…”
Section: Quality Control and Documentationmentioning
confidence: 93%