2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/icif.2018.8455737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern Discovery and Anomaly Detection via Knowledge Graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have considered detection of anomalies using graph data [23]. More recently, several of these methods have focused on multi-relational data, as found in knowledge graphs [24,25,26]. In fact, knowledge graph completion methods, able by definition to infer missing facts, can be readily applied to anomaly detection problems [27].…”
Section: Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have considered detection of anomalies using graph data [23]. More recently, several of these methods have focused on multi-relational data, as found in knowledge graphs [24,25,26]. In fact, knowledge graph completion methods, able by definition to infer missing facts, can be readily applied to anomaly detection problems [27].…”
Section: Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of day can be divided into four time intervals. We set four intervals of the hour: [0, 3), [6,11), [15,24), and [3, 6) ∪ [11,15), according to the time distribution in transactions. We further divide the attribute time into 8 unique values by distinguishing whether it is a weekday.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the main contribution of our work, we aim to effectively model the co-occurrences among transactional attributes for high-performance behavioral models. For this purpose, we propose to adopt the heterogeneous relation network, a special form of the knowledge graph [15], to represent the co-occurrences effectively. Here, a network node (or say an entity) corresponds to an attribute value in transactions, and an edge corresponds to a heterogeneous association between different attribute values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complex networked systems (CNS), structural observability determines the number of nodes to be measured to [10], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] Link prediction [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] Node classification [38], [39], [40], [41] Synchronization [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50] Controllability [10], [22], [51], [25], [26], [27], [28] Anomaly detection [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60] Topological analysis [5], [61], [62],…”
Section: A Prerequisites Of Setting and Fulfilling Model's Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%