2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.11165
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation in one-dimensional polaron systems and temporal orthogonality catastrophe

G. M. Koutentakis,
S. I. Mistakidis,
P. Schmelcher

Abstract: Recent studies have demonstrated that higher than two-body bath-impurity correlations are not important for quantitatively describing the ground state of the Bose polaron. Motivated by the above, we employ the so-called Gross Ansatz (GA) approach to unravel the stationary and dynamical properties of the homogeneous one-dimensional Bose-polaron for different impurity momenta and bath-impurity couplings. We explicate that the character of the equilibrium state crossovers from the quasi-particle Bose polaron regi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(259 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then discuss why the Yukawa potential is inadequate and also outline why some of the standard methods used to go beyond the Fröhlich model in the single impurity case do not generalize in a straightforward manner. We then show how those problems can be remedied in a conceptually simple and intuitive way by accounting for boson-boson interaction at the meanfield level, in line with previous treatments of bipolarons in 1D [40] and single polarons [34,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. This is done by applying the Lee-Low-Pines transformation [48] and transforming to the center of mass coordinates for the two impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We then discuss why the Yukawa potential is inadequate and also outline why some of the standard methods used to go beyond the Fröhlich model in the single impurity case do not generalize in a straightforward manner. We then show how those problems can be remedied in a conceptually simple and intuitive way by accounting for boson-boson interaction at the meanfield level, in line with previous treatments of bipolarons in 1D [40] and single polarons [34,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. This is done by applying the Lee-Low-Pines transformation [48] and transforming to the center of mass coordinates for the two impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The heavy effective mass regime has potential experimental relevance, as it is relevant for realizing physical phenomena, such as Bloch oscillations [14,19]. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrates that the dynamical phenomenon of temporal orthogonality catastrophe is exhibited, given the impurity-boson couplings are sufficiently stronger than the intra-species background ones [28]. Another interesting feature shown in Figure 6b is that the impurity effective mass is approximately equal to the soliton mass for η = γ. the regime where η < γ (seen for γ = 0.2), the effective mass becomes very small in magnitude, trending towards zero.…”
Section: Two-body Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While experimental studies have started, the quantitative understanding of impurity physics in a one-dimensional Bose gas is far from complete. The different theoretical approaches to the problem range from mean-field theory [25,26] and related variational theory [27][28][29] via the path-integral approach [30,31], the renormalization group [32][33][34] and flow equation [35] method to multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree [36] and quantum Monte Carlo methods [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the variational nonperturbative multi-layer multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree method for atomic mixtures (ML-MCTDHX) [42] to calculate the spin-order properties of an impurity immersed in a Bose gas. This method treats the impurity-gas system beyond the usual Bogoliubov treatment and thus the Fröhlich model [43], as well as to account for boson-boson correlations beyond the Lee-Low-Pines approach [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%