2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2003.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation of cytochrome c by microcontact printing and dip-pen nanolithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the fusion protein dots was 2 lm in diameter and the spacing distance was 7 lm, which is in good agreement with the geometry of the original PDMS stamp having protruded dot regions of 3 lm in diameter and 10 lm in spacing [15]. After rinsing the substrate with DI-water, the average height of protein is slightly decreased since nonspecifically attached fusion protein molecules to the substrate were removed [15]. The patterns of fusion proteins obtained by micro contact printing method had high contrast and resolution.…”
Section: Verification Of Fusion Protein Sa Layersupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the fusion protein dots was 2 lm in diameter and the spacing distance was 7 lm, which is in good agreement with the geometry of the original PDMS stamp having protruded dot regions of 3 lm in diameter and 10 lm in spacing [15]. After rinsing the substrate with DI-water, the average height of protein is slightly decreased since nonspecifically attached fusion protein molecules to the substrate were removed [15]. The patterns of fusion proteins obtained by micro contact printing method had high contrast and resolution.…”
Section: Verification Of Fusion Protein Sa Layersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…After the stamp was displaced, substrate on which the pattern of fusion protein was formed was rinsed by DI water. This procedure is necessary to remove fusion protein non-specifically adsorbed by weak physical interactions [15]. Pattern formation was confirmed by STM measurement.…”
Section: Pattern Formation By Micro Contact Printing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The reaction of IgG patterns with rabbit antibody and with mixtures of proteins was also studied using AFM to investigate and detect nonspecific binding to nanopatterns and to passivated areas of the substrate. In another study, Choi and coworkers immobilized cytochrome c through electrostatic adsorption on nanopatterns of MHA written by DPN [87]. The areas surrounding the MHA nanopatterns were passivated with octadecanethiol.…”
Section: Dpn Of Sams and Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because amine groups are abundant in most proteins, covalent binding with amide bond formation is generally used in protein patterning. For noncovalent binding approaches, electrostatic interactions,30–34 biotin‐avidin coupling,35–38 and coordination chemistry38–42 have been mainly performed. Subcellular‐scaled patterns of protein adherent molecules can be stored for a certain time period until just before reaction with a target protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%