Patterns of accelerometer‐based sedentary behavior and their association with cardiorespiratory fitness in adults

Abstract

We aimed to identify patterns of sedentary behavior (SB) and examined whether cardiorespiratory fitness differs between classes with distinct patterns of SB. One hundred and seventy participants (57% women, mean age = 56.4 years) received accelerometry monitoring for 7 days. Prior to accelerometry assessment, cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed by peak oxygen uptake (VO ). VO was directly measured during a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer. Patterns in accelerometer data were classified based on time spent in SB per day using growth mixture modeling. Model-implied class-specific VO means were compared using adjusted equality test of means. Growth mixture modeling revealed four patterns of SB: "High, stable" (n = 120, M = 724.9 min/d), "Low, increase" (n = 14, M = 622.2 min/d), "Low, decrease" (n = 11, M = 540.2 min/d), and "High, decrease" (n = 25, M = 694.8 min/d). Persons in class "High, stable" had significantly lower VO values (M = 25.0 mL/kg/min, SD = 0.6) compared to persons in class "Low, increase" (M = 30.5 mL/kg/min, SD = 3.6; P = 0.001), in class "Low, decrease" (M = 30.1 mL/kg/min, SD = 5.0; P = 0.009), and in class "High, decrease" (M = 29.6 mL/kg/min, SD = 5.9; P = 0.032). No differences among the other classes were found. We identified four classes of individuals with distinct patterns of SB and showed that VO partially differs between classes. Especially, individuals with stable high SB levels throughout the week might be addressed in public health recommendations and interventions.

Movement behavior remains stable in stroke survivors within the first two months after returning home

“…psychosocial health-related quality of life [21] and functional recovery [22] within the first year after stroke. In healthy populations, SB and MVPA were found to have four to seven subgroup trajectories each [23,24]. Because the stroke recovery process is heterogeneous, different subgroup trajectories of movement behavior outcomes can be expected.…”